2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.04355
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Optimization in the Presence of Noise

Abstract: The problem of interest is the minimization of a nonlinear function subject to nonlinear equality constraints using a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method. The minimization must be performed while observing only noisy evaluations of the objective and constraint functions. In order to obtain stability, the classical SQP method is modified by relaxing the standard Armijo line search based on the noise level in the functions, which is assumed to be known. Convergence theory is presented giving conditions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for relaxing both the numerator and denominator in (7) is to be consistent with the classical narrative of trust region methods where a ratio close to 1 is an indication that the model is adequate. An alternative approach would be to relax only the numerator and interpret the condition ρ k > c (where c > 0 is a constant) as a relaxed Armijo condition of the type studied in [2,21]. We find the first interpretation to be easier to motivate and to yield tighter bounds in the convergence analysis.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for relaxing both the numerator and denominator in (7) is to be consistent with the classical narrative of trust region methods where a ratio close to 1 is an indication that the model is adequate. An alternative approach would be to relax only the numerator and interpret the condition ρ k > c (where c > 0 is a constant) as a relaxed Armijo condition of the type studied in [2,21]. We find the first interpretation to be easier to motivate and to yield tighter bounds in the convergence analysis.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Those three papers give conditions under which convergence can be expected, giving careful attention to the behavior of the penalty parameter. Using a relaxed Armijo line search procedure, [21] shows global convergence to a neighborhood of the solution for an SQP method for equality constrained problems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these works showed global convergence of different StoSQP schemes. In addition to these works, Oztoprak et al (2021); Sun and Nocedal (2022) considered optimization with noisy functions. Those analyses require known, deterministic, and bounded noise, and thus they are not suited for the considered problems in (1).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that several algorithm choices in the two papers [7,28], e.g., merit functions and merit parameters, are different. Several other extensions have been proposed [3,6,8,17,27,32], and very few of these works (or others in the literature) derive worst-case iteration complexity (or sample complexity) due to the difficulties that arise because of the constrained setting and the stochasticity. Notable exceptions are, [16] where the authors provide convergence rates (and complexity guarantees) for the algorithm proposed in [7], and [3,29] that provide complexity bounds for variants of the stochastic SQP methods under additional assumptions and in the setting in which the errors can be diminished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%