2007
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Joint Inversion of Gravity and Seismic Data Using the Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Abstract: Joint inversion is an important quantitative interpretation tool for integrated geophysics. The present study situation and progress of joint inversion using gravity and seismic data are reviewed and discussed in the paper first. Then, the improved very fast simulated annealing algorithm (VFSA) with its obvious advantage of finding overall optimal solution in inverse problems is applied. So the constrained synchronous joint inversion of gravity and seismic data using the improved VFSA is put forward. The model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach was applied to process the field observed MT data in the regions of Guangdong Xuwen [30] . The statistic result of rock's physical property of resistivity in this region is as follows: Quaternary is a medium-high resistant layer, resistivity is 10∼100 Ωm; Upper-Tertiary is a medium resistant layer, its resistivity is 10∼20 Ωm; Lower-Tertiary is low resistant, its resistivity is 5∼10 Ωm; Early-Mesozoic is high resistant with the resistivity larger than 100 Ωm.…”
Section: Field Data Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach was applied to process the field observed MT data in the regions of Guangdong Xuwen [30] . The statistic result of rock's physical property of resistivity in this region is as follows: Quaternary is a medium-high resistant layer, resistivity is 10∼100 Ωm; Upper-Tertiary is a medium resistant layer, its resistivity is 10∼20 Ωm; Lower-Tertiary is low resistant, its resistivity is 5∼10 Ωm; Early-Mesozoic is high resistant with the resistivity larger than 100 Ωm.…”
Section: Field Data Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author ever used the improved VFSA of Yang [19] and Chen et al [17,20] to conduct a joint inversion of magnetotelluric and seismic data and also the integrated inversion of gravity & magnetic data [21,22] . He also carried out a constrained joint inversion of gravity and seismic data using VFSA algorithm [23] , and quite good effects were obtained. Therefore, the gravity anomaly inversion including the synthetic model test and field observed data using this self-developed improved VFSA is introduced in this paper.…”
Section: The Improved Very Fast Simulated Annealing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have realized a constrained synchronous joint inversion of gravity and seismic data using improved simulated annealing algorithm [5] on the basis of analyses of present situations in gravity and seismic joint inversion, the effects and features of this method were represented by model test with uncommon density and velocity interfaces and practical application. Among them, gravity forward modeling was fulfilled by using a 2.5 dimensional rectangle gridded model [5,6] , the seismic travel time was computed by shooting method of raytracing [5,7] . The advantages of adopting travel time in joint inversion lie in that travel time depends mainly on the velocity structure and without close relations with exciting-receiving conditions and instrument properties, so may have high S/N ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of adopting travel time in joint inversion lie in that travel time depends mainly on the velocity structure and without close relations with exciting-receiving conditions and instrument properties, so may have high S/N ratio. There are many methods to compute travel time, the shooting method uses ray-tracing equation to compute travel times and adjusts the shooting angle and ray density, the travel time is found by interpolating between the two rays closest to the receiver [5] . However, rays tracing may not be accurately determined when using shooting method in gridded media especially in the situations of low velocity stratum or large velocity variations [8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation