2009
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothest Model and Sharp Boundary Based Two‐Dimensional Magnetotelluric Inversion

Abstract: How to get rapid and stable inversion results and clear geological interfaces is a focus problem in current Magnetotelluric (MT) inversion. With the purpose to represent clear boundary with resistivity discontinuity, the paper integrates the ideas of OCCAM inversion and sharp boundary inversion (SBI) to construct a new objective function for inversion by using the minimum gradient support functional and conjugate gradient inversion method to solve the optimal minimum. So the 2-D MT inversion method based on OC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhdanov (2009) also applied the MGS functional to invert gravity and EM data. Zhang et al (2009Zhang et al ( , 2010 used this theory to invert 2-D MT data and obtain clear images of geo-electrical interfaces.…”
Section: -D Mt Inversion With Minimum Gradient Support 297mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhdanov (2009) also applied the MGS functional to invert gravity and EM data. Zhang et al (2009Zhang et al ( , 2010 used this theory to invert 2-D MT data and obtain clear images of geo-electrical interfaces.…”
Section: -D Mt Inversion With Minimum Gradient Support 297mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms provide smooth solutions, but few are suitable for clearly imaging geo-electrical interfaces. Zhang et al (2009Zhang et al ( , 2010 used this theory to invert 2-D MT data and obtain clear images of geo-electrical interfaces. Portniaguine & Zhdanov (1999, 2002 proposed a focusing geophysical inversion using the minimum gradient support (MGS) functional and used the MGS functional in gravity and magnetic inversion (Zhdanov et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7a, b). The 2D wedge model configuration is the same as that used by de Groot-Hedlin and Constable (2004) and Zhang et al (2009). The upper boundary of the wedge has a slope of 5.7°, and the lower boundary has a slope of 16.6°.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Wedge Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it needs to build a layered model to invert both resistivity and thickness of each layer for every horizontal mesh, which is very complicated in the model construction and inversion calculation. Meanwhile, Zhang et al (2009Zhang et al ( , 2010 added diagonal gradient support to the objective functional, which consists of both smoothing and focusing constraints, and obtained better inversion results in imaging an inclined geoelectrical interface. Recently, Grayver and Kuvshinov (2016) applied arbitrary norms for residual and regularization terms to produce classes of equivalent solutions of smooth or compact models, in which a L 1.5 norm was shown to be most efficient for a stable inversion with sharp boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms with better fitting performance have smaller errors. For example, the MODEM inversion method has poor boundary convergence, while the Bayesian 2D inversion method performs well in boundary inversion [ 20 , 21 ]. However, many inversion algorithms, including machine learning algorithms, may have errors to varying degrees [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%