Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP

Benítez, Julio; Carpitella, Silvia; Certa, Antonella; Izquierdo, Joaquín

doi:10.1016/j.amc.2020.125273

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), first proposed by Thomas Saaty [25], is a mathematical model-based evaluation method that converts a qualitative decision problem into a quantitative analysis and ultimately also determines the value of the situation based on the weights between the different elements. It is able to synthesize judgments and evaluate the solution well under different weights [26]. Hierarchical analysis also relies on expert personnel to make decisions to assign values to the judgment matrix, depends on the level of the decision maker, and the scalar workload increases and the accuracy decreases when there are too many elements.…”

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of key algorithms for network security situation awareness research

Yao¹,

Yu²,

Yang³

et al. 2022

International Conference on Cloud Computing, Performance Computing, and Deep Learning (CCPCDL 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid development of Internet technology, network threats are also increasing rapidly. Traditional ways of dealing with network threats, such as intrusion detection technology and malicious code detection technology, reveal the shortcomings of poor quantitative analysis and poor prediction of future situations. In order to cope with today's complex and changing network situation, network security situation awareness technology has gained more attention. Network security situation awareness consists of three layers: situation element extraction, situation understanding and situation prediction, and a complete network security situation awareness model is constructed through the three parts. The paper introduces the concept and development of network security situation awareness, describes the current mainstream algorithms and their advantages and disadvantages for each layer, and finally summarizes and outlooks on the problems of current mainstream algorithms and the trends of future development.

show abstract

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of key algorithms for network security situation awareness research

Yao¹,

Yu²,

Yang³

et al. 2022

International Conference on Cloud Computing, Performance Computing, and Deep Learning (CCPCDL 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The different methods that can be used for determining criteria weights and for evaluating alternative solutions are presented in Figures 1 and 2. The classification was developed by the authors on the basis of published research [11,12]. In this contribution, the authors focus on the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (hereinafter "AHP") on a model example of a MCDM problem.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Alternative Solutions and Determination Of Prementioning

confidence: 99%

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Managers have to make decisions several times a day. The decision-making process can be defined as an essential activity realized by managers every day. Decisions can be implemented intuitively, or by using relevant decision-making methods. This depends on the nature of the decision, as well as the intensity of its possible future effects. The theory of decision-making can be defined as a relatively young discipline. It can be stated that decision-making is no longer an intuitive process. Most decision-making situations are of a multiple criteria character. In this contribution, the authors focus on multiple-criteria decision-making, to which several methods can be applied. In the practical part, the authors use Saaty's method, also known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Saaty is considered to be the most important researcher dealing with the issue of multiple-criteria decision-making. The set multiple-criteria decision-making problem was to choose one business partner out of eight under consideration. The decision-making criteria included selected financial indicators and non-financial criteria. The aim of the contribution is to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess potential business partners and to select an optimal candidate.

show abstract

“…For sustainable risk analysis and decision-making in the construction sector [47], an alternative approach based on consistent fuzzy preference relation and ANP methodology provided. Multi-criteria decision-making methods are used by individuals and enterprises to achieve effective solutions for many of their problems, since they usually include subjective, intangible, and not easily quantifiable aspects [48]. The research [49] applies Fuzzy multi criteria decision-making methodology, called DEcision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) method, to investigate the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of project management.…”

Section: The Background Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is dedicated to the modelling of decision process occurring during the implementation of construction projects. Recent studies generally do not assess the robustness of the decisions regarding the possible changes during the construction project implementation. However, such an assessment might increase the reliability of the decision-making process. We addressed this gap through a new model that combines the decision-making process modelling with the AHP method and includes the analysis of model stability concerning stakeholders’ behaviour. We used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Decision tree methods to model the decision-making process. The proposed model was validated on a case study of multiple construction projects. The assessment was performed from individual investor’s and independent expert’s perspectives. The criteria for the assessment were selected according to the principles of sustainability. We performed the sensitivity analysis, making it possible to assess the possible changes of the decisions depending on the potential patterns of the decision-makers’ behaviour. The results of the study show that, sometimes, small fluctuations in the project factors affect the project selection indicating the possible lack of the robustness of the project decisions.

show abstract

Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP

Cited by 8 publications

References 34 publications

A review of key algorithms for network security situation awareness research

A review of key algorithms for network security situation awareness research

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About