2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive modeling of pressure dependent plasticity and fracture in solder joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The invariant I 1 is related to hydrostatic stress. From the knowledge of tensile tests performed with solder joints [9,10], one may conclude that a triaxiality of stress does not induce delamination behavior. In fact, solder joints exposed to hydrostatic stress can carry loads above the tensile strength of bulk solder materials.…”
Section: Fem Simulation and Theoretical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariant I 1 is related to hydrostatic stress. From the knowledge of tensile tests performed with solder joints [9,10], one may conclude that a triaxiality of stress does not induce delamination behavior. In fact, solder joints exposed to hydrostatic stress can carry loads above the tensile strength of bulk solder materials.…”
Section: Fem Simulation and Theoretical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the phenomenological point of view, the justification for this step is simply that the numerical fits to experiments are improved. But there are also some theoretical aspects behind this idea: When the crystal lattice is stretched, the dislocations have more space to move and therefore the resistance to glide is reduced [10]. On the other hand, when the material is under pressure P, the opposite is observed.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Our Dislocation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross contraction of the solder is obstructed by the vicinity to the stronger copper base material. Therefore, the tensile strength of thin solder joints is higher than that of thicker joints [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%