2015
DOI: 10.1101/gad.267997.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive BAK activation as a determinant of drug sensitivity in malignant lymphohematopoietic cells

Abstract: Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), a key step in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is incompletely understood. Current models emphasize the role of BH3-only BCL2 family members in BAX and BAK activation. Here we demonstrate concentration-dependent BAK autoactivation under cell-free conditions and provide evidence that this autoactivation plays a key role in regulating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in intact cells. In particular, we show that up to 80% of BAK (but not BAX) in lymphohematopoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
7
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, this suggests that sequestration of BAK by BCLXL is much more critical for keeping cells alive than preventing BAK from becoming directly activated by BH3-only proteins. These findings are consistent with other studies proposing a unifying or hierarchical model of BCL2 protein function (Llambi et al 2011;Chen et al 2015) and also a recent report by Dai et al (2015), who observed that drug sensitivity of hematopoietic cancers correlates well with the oligomeric state and the amount of BAK present in a cell rather than with the ability of BAK to engage direct activators, such as BIM or PUMA. Perhaps all of these interactions between BH3-only proteins and prosurvival BCL2 proteins serve only one higher purpose: facilitating direct interactions of BAX with BAK.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Overall, this suggests that sequestration of BAK by BCLXL is much more critical for keeping cells alive than preventing BAK from becoming directly activated by BH3-only proteins. These findings are consistent with other studies proposing a unifying or hierarchical model of BCL2 protein function (Llambi et al 2011;Chen et al 2015) and also a recent report by Dai et al (2015), who observed that drug sensitivity of hematopoietic cancers correlates well with the oligomeric state and the amount of BAK present in a cell rather than with the ability of BAK to engage direct activators, such as BIM or PUMA. Perhaps all of these interactions between BH3-only proteins and prosurvival BCL2 proteins serve only one higher purpose: facilitating direct interactions of BAX with BAK.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Plasmid encoding BakΔTM (GenBank BC004431, residues 1-186) in pET29b(+) 57 was a kind gift from Qian Liu and Kalle Gehring (McGill University, Montreal, Canada). Procedures to purify His 6 -tagged PUMA, BAD, tBID, NOXA and BAKΔTM 20,21,37 as well as BCL2ΔTM, BCLX L ΔTM and MCL1ΔTM 24,49 have been previously described. The EGFP open reading frame was cloned into pGEX-4 T-1 to yield a construct with EGFP fused at its N-terminus to GST.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the recent suggestion that all antiapoptotic BCL2 family members might have similar effects, 46 we observed that wild-type BCL2 and MCL1 increased the tolerance for BIM EL about equally (Figures 4b and e), whereas BCL2 preferentially increased PUMA tolerance ( Figure 4c) and MCL1, which Figure 4a) although BCL2 has a stronger affinity for BAD. 29 This paradoxical observation might reflect the finding that partially activated BAK is extensively bound to BCLX L in Jurkat cells 24 and, upon displacement by BAD, would be buffered better by MCL1. 49 When the impact of BIM siRNA was assessed, BIM knockdown by 90% (Figure 4f To further assess the impact of antiapoptotic BCL2 family members, we examined K562 and HCT116 cells, two lines with higher endogenous BCLX L and MCL1 levels ( Figure 5a).…”
Section: Bh3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AMPK фос-форилирует p53 по серину 15, что, в свою очередь, приводит к стабилизации белка и его накоплению в митохондриях [16][17][18]. Фосфорилированный p53 индуцирует высвобождение проапоптотического белка BAK из комплекса с Bcl-xL с последующим усилением апоптоза и, соответственно, чувствительности клетки к химиотерапевтическим агентам [19,20].…”
Section: экспериментальные статьиunclassified