2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2014.7090561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant-time monocular self-calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the expensive information metric and optimization algorithm prevent its use on resource-constrained platforms. Similarly, Keivan and Sibley [25] maintain a database of the most informative images to calibrate the intrinsic parameters of a camera but use a more efficient entropy-based information metric for the selection. Nobre et al [26] extend the same framework to calibrate multiple sensors and more recently Nobre et al [27] also include the relative pose between an IMU and a camera.…”
Section: E Passive Observability-aware Calibration -Calibration On Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the expensive information metric and optimization algorithm prevent its use on resource-constrained platforms. Similarly, Keivan and Sibley [25] maintain a database of the most informative images to calibrate the intrinsic parameters of a camera but use a more efficient entropy-based information metric for the selection. Nobre et al [26] extend the same framework to calibrate multiple sensors and more recently Nobre et al [27] also include the relative pose between an IMU and a camera.…”
Section: E Passive Observability-aware Calibration -Calibration On Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, we take a similar approach to [24,25] but also consider inertial measurements and consequently collect informative segments instead of images. In contrast to the general method of [24], we use an approximation for the visual-inertial use-case and neglect any cross-terms between segments when evaluating their information content.…”
Section: E Passive Observability-aware Calibration -Calibration On Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons we focus on estimating sensor extrinsics. For camera intrinsic self-calibration refer to [1,19]. The proposed FastCal algorithm can be divided into three major components, summarized in algorithm 1: 1) Selecting informative segments so as to bound the computation time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], the update criteria was if the entropy h candidate associated to the measurements D candidate was smaller than the worst scoring batch in D in f o by a certain margin, the segment was swapped into the informative segment queue and a new estimate for Θ was obtained by optimizing over all the measurements in the queue. This approach performs well, as shown in [19,1], however it causes an excessive number of estimations of the entire priority queue, every time a new candidate segment is swapped in. could be swapped into the priority queue in place of segment 2, however by waiting until time t = 5 we can instead swap in the candidate window at time t = 4, with much more information content.…”
Section: Informative Segment Selectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our work, we follow a similar approach and identify informative motion segments to build a sparser but complete calibration dataset. Similarly to the work of [12], we use the entropy to efficiently approximate the information content of segments but calibrate the full visual-inertial model instead of just a camera. Additionally, we extend the information measure and evaluate the informativeness of segments w.r.t.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%