2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2019.2893809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observability-Aware Self-Calibration of Visual and Inertial Sensors for Ego-Motion Estimation

Abstract: External effects such as shocks and temperature variations affect the calibration of visual-inertial sensor systems and thus they cannot fully rely on factory calibrations. Recalibrations performed on short user-collected datasets might yield poor performance since the observability of certain parameters is highly dependent on the motion. Additionally, on resourceconstrained systems (e.g mobile phones), full-batch approaches over longer sessions quickly become prohibitively expensive.In this paper, we approach… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Qin and Shen [132] extended their prior work on batch-based monocular VINS [31] to include the time offset between the camera and IMU by interpolating the locations of features on the image plane. Schneider et al [140] proposed the observability-aware online calibration utilizing the most informative motions. While we recently have also analyzed the degenerate motions of spatiotemporal calibration [141], it is not fully understood how to optimally model intrinsics and simultaneously calibrate them along with extrinsics [142,143].…”
Section: Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qin and Shen [132] extended their prior work on batch-based monocular VINS [31] to include the time offset between the camera and IMU by interpolating the locations of features on the image plane. Schneider et al [140] proposed the observability-aware online calibration utilizing the most informative motions. While we recently have also analyzed the degenerate motions of spatiotemporal calibration [141], it is not fully understood how to optimally model intrinsics and simultaneously calibrate them along with extrinsics [142,143].…”
Section: Sensor Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their extended batch-based monocular VINS (termed VINS-Mono) [40], the IMU biases are included in a sliding window nonlinear estimator. Schneider et al [41] introduced information-theoretic metrics to assess the information content of trajectory segments, thus allowing them to select the most informative parts from a dataset for extrinsic spatial calibration purposes. Huang et al [19] proposed an estimator to incrementally solve several linear equations to estimate the spatial parameters between an IMU and two cameras.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [43], the trajectory is parameterized with B-splines and included in the optimization problem. In [44], only the parts of the trajectory that contribute more to the observability of the problem are considered, so that the computational complexity is reduced. Other interesting works can be found in [45][46][47].…”
Section: ) Back-endmentioning
confidence: 99%