In this paper Dr. Peter J. Howland-former bureaucrat, concrete block maker, journo (investigative and sports), publican, apple picker, bank clerk (for one week), gas station attendant (for two weeks), horse-racing results editor and now, wine scholar and practicing neo-Marxist Sociologist-reflexively interviews himself on the current situations in the 'Sociology of Wine' while sitting at his kitchen table nursing a newly inserted 'bionic' elbow and arm, drinking a local Pinot Noir, and 'floating' along on a concoction of painkillers and anti-inflammatories.Given his somewhat physically and socially unsettled circumstances, Howland is unsurprisingly drawn to discussing one of his grumpy old man 'pet peeves'-that is how in the sociological study of wine the foundational and enduring materialities of commercial winemaking-and especially its botanical and economic affordances-are often under-analysed at best or at worst, are demonised as reductive and outmoded. Consequently, Howland argues with himself that these factors are also often overwhelmed by the bling of 'flashy cultural turns' in analysis and theorizing. He calls on sociologists far abler than himself to ensure the foundational and the obvious are an integral part of all wine scholarship-much like the laws of motion are always accounted for in physics research. Howland points to a number of studies that successfully (or at least, that commendably attempt to) combine both the foundational and the cultural turning-ideally highlighting their mutual constitutions and contradictions.