“…This has typically been seen with allozymes markers (Solé-Cava and Thorpe, 1992;Monteiro et al, 1997;Manchenko et al, 2000;Schama et al, 2005); although analyses using high-throughput sequencing technologies have reached quite similar conclusions (Reitzel et al, 2013;Spano et al, 2018). Phylogenetic approaches using single or concatenated genes are less consistent, detecting both high and low levels of differentiation among closely related lineages (Acuña et al, 2007;Gomes et al, 2012;Pereira et al, 2014;Canales-Aguirre et al, 2015;González-Muñoz et al, 2015;Mallien et al, 2018). In terms of phylogenetic informativeness, the fragments12S rDNA and 18S rDNA have proved to be more proficient to recover well-supported nodes compared to 16S rDNA, 28S rDNA and other barcode markers, such as COI and ITS (Daly et al, 2010;Dohna and Kochzius, 2016).…”