1998
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0811:cpdiae>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation patterns during initiation and evolution of a plate-boundary decollement zone: Northern Barbados accretionary prism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] Assuming 100% water saturation the model predicts a range of porosity increase from 8.5-9% to 15.5-16.8% (i.e., depending on the degree of compaction for an average clay content of 0.33) to explain a Vp decrease from 4.3 km/s (background) to 3.6 km/s (within LVZ1) in sediments at 8 kmbsf and 2.5 km water depth (Figures 3c and 8c). The predicted magnitude of porosity increase is comparable to reported porosity increases for other margins (i.e., 30-60% porosity increases), inferred to be caused by undercompaction of subducting sediments (e.g., Barbados [Bangs et al, 1990;Westbrook, 1991;Moore et al, 1998;Hayward et al, 2003], Nankai [Hyndman et al, 1993;Screaton et al, 2002;Bangs et al, 2009;Tobin and Saffer, 2009], Ecuador [Calahorrano et al, 2008]).…”
Section: Low Velocity Zones-lvz1 and Lvz2supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[35] Assuming 100% water saturation the model predicts a range of porosity increase from 8.5-9% to 15.5-16.8% (i.e., depending on the degree of compaction for an average clay content of 0.33) to explain a Vp decrease from 4.3 km/s (background) to 3.6 km/s (within LVZ1) in sediments at 8 kmbsf and 2.5 km water depth (Figures 3c and 8c). The predicted magnitude of porosity increase is comparable to reported porosity increases for other margins (i.e., 30-60% porosity increases), inferred to be caused by undercompaction of subducting sediments (e.g., Barbados [Bangs et al, 1990;Westbrook, 1991;Moore et al, 1998;Hayward et al, 2003], Nankai [Hyndman et al, 1993;Screaton et al, 2002;Bangs et al, 2009;Tobin and Saffer, 2009], Ecuador [Calahorrano et al, 2008]).…”
Section: Low Velocity Zones-lvz1 and Lvz2supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar deep rooted vertical zones of seismic blanking associated with tectonically driven sediment deformation have been observed farther north along the Hikurangi margin and suggested to be preferred paths for focused fluid escape [Crutchley et al, 2011]. [41] We hypothesize that normal faults, underlying the stack of protothrusts at the base of the anticline and fractures at its flanks (Figure 6b), have facilitated depletion not only of pore water during compaction [Hyndman et al, 1993;Moore et al, 1998;Bangs et al, 1999;Screaton et al, 2002] but also gas from potential thermogenic accumulations in Cretaceous subducting sediments (section 5.4). These fluids have been accumulating at the crest of the anticline beneath the BSR (Figure 5).…”
Section: Fluid Migration Pathsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Décollement position is also influenced by the physical properties and lithologies of the trench sediments. Across the Barbados Ridge and Sumatra, seismic surveys and drilling deformation front show lithologic and physical property characteristics that lead to overpressures along weak layers within the incoming sediment conducive to seaward propagation of a continuous décollement (Dean et al, 2010; Deng & Underwood, 2001; Hüpers et al, 2017; Moore et al, 1998). In the Nankai trough, the décollement forms within with the deeper continuous sequences deposited seaward of the trench wedge and may be influenced more by lithology than high pore pressure (Kopf, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower part of Unit IV (seismic Unit 8, Figure 2a), Unit V, and the top of Unit VI show similar characteristics to that developed at the locus for the formation of the future décollement at other subduction zones. In subduction zones, the décollement generally forms in overpressured fluid‐rich and highly porous clay‐rich zones correlated to high‐amplitude negative polarity seismic reflection (Bangs et al, 1999, 2004; Cochrane et al, 1994; Dean et al, 2010; Mikada et al, 2005; Moore et al, 1998; Moore & Shipley, 1993; Shipley et al, 1994) and/or freshening anomalies associated with bound water release (e.g., Bekins et al, 1995; Dutilleul et al, 2020; Henry, 1997; Henry & Bourlange, 2004; Spinelli et al, 2006). At Site U1520, geophysical and geochemical signatures including local elevated bound water content related to high smectite, zeolite, and opal content, high amplitude‐negative polarity seismic reflections (seismic Unit 9, Figure 2a) and freshening anomalies suggest that volcaniclastic Units V and VI are fluid‐rich.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%