2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent results of non-invasive PGT-A of human embryos using two different techniques for chromosomal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TE biopsy was typically chosen as the reference sample to which to compare SBM. In these cases, the informativity rate of SBM and the ploidy concordance rate varied, ranging from 69.0% to 97.6% and from 33.3% to 89.1%, respectively (Vera-Rodriguez et al, 2018;Ho et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Yeung et al, 2019;Rubio et al, 2019;Lledo et al, 2020;Shitara et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021a) (Table 1). Only one study compared SBM to PB biopsy and obtained an 81.8% informativity rate of SBM and a 72.2% ploidy concordance rate -22.2% full and 50.0% partial- (Feichtinger et al, 2017) (Table 1).…”
Section: Embryonic Cfdna Analysis For Nipgt-a: Concordance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TE biopsy was typically chosen as the reference sample to which to compare SBM. In these cases, the informativity rate of SBM and the ploidy concordance rate varied, ranging from 69.0% to 97.6% and from 33.3% to 89.1%, respectively (Vera-Rodriguez et al, 2018;Ho et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Yeung et al, 2019;Rubio et al, 2019;Lledo et al, 2020;Shitara et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021a) (Table 1). Only one study compared SBM to PB biopsy and obtained an 81.8% informativity rate of SBM and a 72.2% ploidy concordance rate -22.2% full and 50.0% partial- (Feichtinger et al, 2017) (Table 1).…”
Section: Embryonic Cfdna Analysis For Nipgt-a: Concordance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embryos in culture release small amounts of cfDNA to the media. In most studies involving non-invasive testing protocols, AH was performed to increase the release of DNA and assure enough embryonic cfDNA in the sample (Shamonki et al, 2016;Feichtinger et al, 2017;Ho et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Jiao et al, 2019;Yeung et al, 2019;Lledo et al, 2020;Kuznyetsov et al, 2020). The benefit of such procedure has not been confirmed (Ho et al, 2018).…”
Section: ) Is Assisted Hatching (Ah) or Previous Vitrification Needed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obvious advantage of these methods is the non-invasiveness or minimal invasiveness of the technique. Other advantages include cost efficiency, time efficiency, and a lesser need for extensively trained staff [ 11 , 13 ].…”
Section: Preimplantation Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invasive biopsy of TE improves embryo selection, implantation and pregnancy rates, and the number of live births [ 10 ]. It also requires a team of highly trained embryologists, since the procedure is very complex and invasive [ 11 ]. Because the method of genetic testing varies, the procedure is not standardized and the results between different centers vary substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation