Objective: To study whether embryonic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in spent blastocyst media is representative of the chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. Design: Pilot prospective blinded study. Setting: In vitro fertilization center and genetics laboratory. Patient(s): A total of 115 trophectoderm (TE) biopsies and spent blastocyst media (SBM) from 46 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 46 years, whose indications for preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy (PGT-A) were advanced maternal age, recurrent miscarriage, or recurrent implantation failure. Interventions(s): Spent blastocyst media collection and TE biopsy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Concordance rates, sensitivity, and specificity between TE biopsies and SBM. Clinical outcomes in cases with euploid TE biopsies and euploid SBM compared with cases with euploid TE and aneuploid SBM. Result(s): In general, the total concordance rate for ploidy and sex was 78.7%, and sensitivity and specificity were 94.5% and 71.7%, respectively. A significant increase for all parameters was observed for day 6/7 samples compared with day 5 samples, with day 6/7 samples showing total concordance for ploidy and sex of 84%, and sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 82.1%, respectively. Ongoing implantation rates in euploid TE/euploid SBM showed a threefold increase compared with euploid TE/aneuploid SBM (52.9% vs. 16.7%, respectively), without reaching significant differences. Interestingly, no miscarriages were observed when TE and SBM were euploidy concordant. Conclusion(s):These results offer a better understanding of the dynamics of cfDNA during embryo development and despite more basic research being needed, they are reassuring to consider in the future this noninvasive approach as an alternative to TE biopsy for PGT-A. (Fertil Steril Ò 2019;112:510-9. Ó2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.
We review here the evolution in the field of embryo aneuploidy testing over the last 20 years, from the analysis of a subset of chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridisation to the transition toward a more comprehensive analysis of all 24 chromosomes. This current comprehensive aneuploidy testing most commonly employs next-generation sequencing (NGS). We present our experience in over 130 000 embryo biopsies using this technology. The incidence of aneuploidy was lower in trophectoderm biopsies compared to cleavage-stage biopsies. We also confirmed by NGS that embryo aneuploidy rates increased with increasing maternal age, mostly attributable to an increase in complex aneuploid embryos. In contrast, the number of MII oocytes retrieved or the use of oocyte vitrification did not affect aneuploidy rates. Similarly, neither maternal age, oocyte number, nor oocyte vitrification affected the incidence of mosaicism. Analysis of clinical outcomes, indications, and potential benefits of embryo aneuploidy testing revealed advanced maternal age as the most favored group, with some evidence of improved delivery rate per transfer as well as decreased miscarriage rates and time to pregnancy. Other indications are: recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failure, severe male factor, previous trisomic pregnancy, and good prognosis patients mainly undergoing single embryo transfer, with the latter indication used to reduce the occurrence of multiple pregnancies without compromising cycle outcome. In conclusion, NGS has become the most appropriate technology for aneuploidy testing in trophectoderm biopsies, with accurate results, high throughput, and cost efficiency. This technology can be also applied to the analysis of the embryonic cell free DNA released to the culture media at blastocyst stage. This is a promising approach towards a non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy.
There is currently no gold standard method for the isolation of LGCs, and protocols should be chosen depending on the purpose in question. We conclude that fluorescence-activated cell sorting is the best protocol for isolating LGCs when purity is the principal criterion, and magnetic separation when both purity and viability are essential. However, cell straining (filter) is probably the least laborious and, overall, the most efficient method to isolate LGCs.
Following early studies showing no adverse effects, cleavage stage biopsy by zona drilling using acid Tyrode’s solution, and removal of single blastomeres for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and identification of sex in couples at risk of X-linked disease, was performed by Handyside and colleagues in late 1989, and pregnancies reported in 1990. This method was later used for specific diagnosis of monogenic conditions, and a few years later also for chromosomal structural and/or numerical impairments, thereby establishing a valuable alternative option to prenatal diagnosis. This revolutionary approach in clinical embryology spread worldwide, and several other embryo biopsy strategies developed over three decades in a process that is still ongoing. The rationale of this narrative review is to outline the different biopsy approaches implemented across the years in the workflow of the IVF clinics that provided PGT: their establishment, the first clinical experiences, their downsides, evolution, improvement and standardization. The history ends with a glimpse of the future: minimally/non-invasive PGT and experimental embryo micromanipulation protocols. This grand theme review outlines a timeline of the evolution of embryo biopsy protocols, whose implementation is increasing worldwide together with the increasing application of PGT techniques in IVF. It represents a vade mecum especially for the past, present and upcoming operators and experts in this field to (re)live this history from its dawn to its most likely future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.