2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent clustering of entries in large pairwise comparison matrices

Abstract: In multi-attribute decision making the number of decision elements under consideration may be huge, especially for complex, real-world problems. Typically these elements are clustered and then the clusters organized hierarchically to reduce the number of elements to be simultaneously handled. These decomposition methodologies are intended to bring the problem within the cognitive ability of decision makers. However, such methodologies have disadvantages, and it may happen that such a priori clustering is not c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, [22] uses AHP to select information criteria that determine the optimal number of groups in a large data set. They also use cluster techniques within AHP [23] but, in this case, to reduce an excessively high number of alternatives. Other proposals closer to our problem are [24,25], but both are carried out within a deterministic context, so they are not directly comparable with our proposal.…”
Section: Multi-actor Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, [22] uses AHP to select information criteria that determine the optimal number of groups in a large data set. They also use cluster techniques within AHP [23] but, in this case, to reduce an excessively high number of alternatives. Other proposals closer to our problem are [24,25], but both are carried out within a deterministic context, so they are not directly comparable with our proposal.…”
Section: Multi-actor Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if judgments were not consistent, this would have a negative impact on the whole quality of final decision. In such a case, experts should be asked to formulate new judgments until the condition of consistency is met [43].…”
Section: Figure 2 Fuzzy Version Of the Saaty Scale [38]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a case, experts should be asked to formulate new judgments until the condition of consistency is met. 43…”
Section: The Fahp To Calculate Criteria Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted by [29], PCMs are a popular tool for weighting criteria and, consequently, evaluating alternatives in relation to a given DM process. However, experts may produce inconsistent judgments [30], especially when comparing a large number of elements [31], due to a natural lack of consistency in human thinking [32]. To help solve this problem, in a previous work [33], the authors developed a linearization process to calculate the closest (synthetic) fully consistent matrix to a given PCM.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%