Consistency of postoperative pain assessments between nurses and patients undergoing enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the consistency of pain intensity and pain location assessed by nurses and patients in gynaecology undergoing enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Background Several studies have shown that clinical nurses' assessment of patients' pain is not always accurate. Little is known about the accuracy of nurses' pain assessments for gynaecological patients. Postoperative pain assessment and management is an essential part of enhanced recovery after surgery. Design Comparative cross‐sectional study. Methods A total of 160 patients were recruited and only 85 patients and 17 nurses participated. Patients and nurses recorded pain scores (using an 11‐point Numeric Rating Scale) and pain location (incision pain, surgical area pain in the abdominal cavity, other pain or no pain) on Pain Assessment Forms at 4 hr after surgery and on the first and second postoperative days. We used the STROBE guidelines to report our study. Results The patients' pain score was higher than that of nurses from 4 hr to second day after laparoscopic surgery at rest. The pain scores of both nurses and patients decreased over this period of time. All the intraclass correlation coefficients were between 0.214–0.296. At the three time points, surgical area pain in the abdominal cavity and abdominal incision pain were the main pain areas. All the kappa coefficients were between 0.164–0.255. Conclusions The consistency of postoperative pain assessment about pain score and pain location between nurses and patients was not high. We should attach importance to systematic pain assessment, and more detailed enhanced recovery after surgery pathways should be developed about pain assessment. Relevance to clinical practice Continuing education for nurses regarding pain assessment is necessary. Nurses should accept the patient's self‐reported pain. There should be a step that gives more time for pain assessment in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways.

Postoperative Pain Management among Registered Nurses in a Vietnamese Hospital

“…Moreover, in the clinical setting, nurses' knowledge and practices are not always consistent [ 13 , 14 ]. They seem to normalize pain after surgery as an acceptable condition that patients have to suffer, leading to a lack of effort or priority in relieving the pain [ 13 , 15 ]. This causes a huge gap between nurses' perception and implementation in postoperative pain management, which possibly poses a great challenge to effective pain management in the hospital.…”

Association of preoperative pain beliefs with postoperative pain levels in abdominal surgery patients

“…Patients who believe that the pain is of organic origin attribute the cause of pain to a neutral external factor and believe that damage or injury to the body causes pain (Pons et al, 2012;Ursavaş & Yaradılmış, 2020). A surgical incision that causes tissue trauma is one of the important reasons for postoperative pain, so the most severe pain is experienced at surgical incision sites (Blicfeldt-Eckhardt et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2020). However, patients who believe that pain is psychological attribute the cause of pain to internal factors and feelings affecting the experience of pain, such as depression and anxiety (Pons et al, 2012;Ursavaş & Yaradılmış, 2020).…”

Neurological Assessment Skill Competency of Registered Nurses in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A One Group Pre-Post Design

“…About 40% of all patients who admit in hospitals with traumatic brain injuries, rather to recover, their conditions get more worsen due to improper assessment and poor management (Arsh et al, 2017). Moreover, poor knowledge and ine cient skill performance of nurses was found associated with prolong hospital stay of patients in emergency departments and intensive care units (Yang et al, 2020). Another study found that lack of knowledge and ine cient skill regarding the GCS assessment was related to late recovery of patients in intensive care units (Gage et al, 2012).…”