Considering student retention as a complex system: a possible way forward for enhancing student retention

Abstract

PostprintThis is the accepted version of a paper published in European Journal of Engineering Education. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.Citation for the original published paper (version of record):Forsman, J., Van den Bogaard, M., Linder, C., Fraser, D. (2015) Considering student retention as a complex system: a possible way forward for enhancing student retention. European Journal of Engineering Education AbstractThis study uses Multilayer Minimum Spanning Tree analysis to develop a model for student retention from a complex system perspective, using data obtained from first year engineering students at a large well-regarded institution in the EU. The results show that the elements of the system of student retention are related to one another through a network of links and that some of these links were found to be strongly persistent across different scales (group sizes). The links were also seen to group together in different clusters of strongly related elements. Links between elements across a wide range of these clusters would have system-wide influence. It was found that there were no links that are both persistent and system-wide. This complex system view of student retention explains why actions to enhance student retention aimed at single elements in the system have had such limited impact. This study therefore points to the need for a more system-wide approach to enhancing student retention.

The impact of project-based learning curriculum on first-year retention, study experiences, and knowledge work competence

“…Moreover, recent research has studied retention as multifaceted, complex system using system theories. When seen as a complex system, it becomes evident that any attempt to improve retention by addressing a single element are bound to fail and more comprehensive means are needed (Forsman et al 2015). Even if retention has been studied for decades and understanding on factors impacting it has improved substantially, progress in improving retention in sustainable manner has been somewhat disappointing.…”

VALIDATING Pathways to Student Success and Retention

“…Such pre-enrollment factors have been at the forefront of more recent retention models (Kerby, 2015;Noel et al, 1985;Singell & Waddell, 2010) including predictive models (Davis et al, 2019) as seen in the current study. However, previous works in student persistence have yet to venture beyond identification of characteristics and toward studying changed behavior over time that may influence the complex system of student retention (Forsman et al, 2015).…”

“…Indeed, they may view such experiences as strictly social activities or an investment in extracurricular or career development contexts. Despite this viewpoint, their involvement is an investment that reflects their behavioral evolution in the college environment, as noted by Forsman et al (2015). This involvement can change their situational context (i.e.…”

Enhancing Student’s Retention of Knowledge by Using Digestive System Textbook Based on Process Images.

“…Retention is an ability to remember concepts and theories that have been studied previously in a certain period, so that can determine the results of a learning process. Student retention belongs to a complex system and it required certain efforts and strategies to improve it (Forsman et al, 2014;Forsman et al, 2015). Educators can organize and conditioned learning in schools to increase student retention (McGregor and Mills, 2012), including the use of textbooks based on process images.…”