2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering sink strength to model crop production under elevated atmospheric CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned moderate reduction in the amount of rainfall is not anticipated to pose significant adverse impacts on maize production in the short-term future. It is understood that under well watered conditions maize responds positively to increasing CO 2 levels, up to a point, because of an increase in canopy size which translates to higher productivity and yields44 through CO 2 fertilisation6. These findings for the 2020s contradict earlier CC impact studies in Lilongwe District which reported declines in maize yields in the short-term future3045.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aforementioned moderate reduction in the amount of rainfall is not anticipated to pose significant adverse impacts on maize production in the short-term future. It is understood that under well watered conditions maize responds positively to increasing CO 2 levels, up to a point, because of an increase in canopy size which translates to higher productivity and yields44 through CO 2 fertilisation6. These findings for the 2020s contradict earlier CC impact studies in Lilongwe District which reported declines in maize yields in the short-term future3045.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Accelerated crop growth can lead to high nutrient requirement and result in soil nitrogen deficiency6. We, therefore, envision that in the short-term future, the increasing demand for food and the positive impacts of CC on maize growth could adversely impact soil fertility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miglietta et al (1998) indicated an increase of tuber yield of 10% for every 100 ppm of CO 2 . The FACE experiments in Italy presented in this study were also used to test the performance of the models LPOTCO and AQUACROP (Wolf and Van Oijen, 2003;Vanuytrecht et al, 2011). The observed yield response of potato to increased CO 2 in these experiments was high but underestimated in the SUBSTOR-potato simulations.…”
Section: Simulations Under High Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study by Kersebaum and Nendel (2014), also for winter wheat and varying sites in Germany, using the same climate model and scenario as the presented study, reported yield decreases by -11.6% if the effect was neglected and depending on the algorithm (three tested in total), 0.9 to 6.0% yield increases if the [CO 2 ] effect was included. Apart from this, several articles exist that deal with [CO 2 ] and crop yields on different scales and approaches (Ziska and Bunce, 2007;Högy and Fangmeier, 2008;Soussana et al, 2010;Vanuytrecht et al, 2011;Weigel and Manderscheid, 2012;Tausz et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%