Abstract:Aims and objectives: The pandemic of COVID-19 is evolving worldwide, and it is associated with high mortality and morbidity. There is a growing need to discuss the elements of a coordinated strategy to control the spread and mitigate the severity of COVID-19. H1N1 and Streptococcus pneumonia vaccines are available. The current analysis was performed to analyze the severity of COVID-19 and influenza (H1N1) vaccination in adults ≥ 65. Also, to correlate the lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs), and influenz… Show more
“…This study shows that influenza vaccination may have some protective effect against COVID-19 acquisition, though this result was found only as a synergistic effect for the international dataset and for Italy, but not for the United States, and results of other studies have also been contradictory [ 46 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. Notably, however, a protective effect of influenza vaccination against coronaviruses and respiratory viruses has previously been reported: Wolff [ 175 ] found that influenza vaccination in the 2017–2018 influenza season protected against resulted in “virus interference”’ with other respiratory infections, “significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.” [ 175 ] Additionally, pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations have been found to synergize in preventing community-acquired pneumonias [ 139 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, as they note [ 45 ], some of the vaccinations occurred within similar time frames for the patient, so confounding effects were difficult to tease apart. Nonetheless, other population-level studies have also identified COVID-19 protective effects of influenza vaccination [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ] and MMR vaccination [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], or more specifically, rubella vaccination [ 48 ]. Again, except for the Sambul et al [ 48 ] study, data were not controlled for possible confounding effects of receiving multiple vaccines within a similar timeframe, but in several controlled studies, neither MMR (or measles-containing and rubella-containing vaccines) nor influenza vaccine was associated with protection against COVID-19 case or death rates in population-wide studies [ 5 , 59 , 60 ].…”
This study examines the relationship of pneumococcal vaccination rates, influenza, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccinations (DTP), polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), and Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (tuberculosis) vaccination rates to COVID-19 case and death rates for 51 nations that have high rates of COVID-19 testing and for which nearly complete childhood, at-risk adult and elderly pneumococcal vaccination data were available. The study is unique in a large number of nations examined, the range of vaccine controls, in testing effects of combinations of vaccinations, and in examining the relationship of COVID-19 and vaccination rates to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Analysis of Italian regions and the states of the United States were also performed. Significant positive correlations were found between IPD (but not lower respiratory infections) and COVID-19 rates, while significant negative correlations were found between pneumococcal vaccination and COVID-19 rates. Influenza and MMR vaccination rates were negatively correlated with lower respiratory infection (LRI) rates and may synergize with pneumococcal vaccination rates to protect against COVID-19. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates were independent of other vaccination rates. These results suggest that endemic rates of bacterial pneumonias, for which pneumococci are a sentinel, may set regional and national susceptibility to severe COVID-19 disease and death.
“…This study shows that influenza vaccination may have some protective effect against COVID-19 acquisition, though this result was found only as a synergistic effect for the international dataset and for Italy, but not for the United States, and results of other studies have also been contradictory [ 46 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. Notably, however, a protective effect of influenza vaccination against coronaviruses and respiratory viruses has previously been reported: Wolff [ 175 ] found that influenza vaccination in the 2017–2018 influenza season protected against resulted in “virus interference”’ with other respiratory infections, “significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections.” [ 175 ] Additionally, pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations have been found to synergize in preventing community-acquired pneumonias [ 139 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, as they note [ 45 ], some of the vaccinations occurred within similar time frames for the patient, so confounding effects were difficult to tease apart. Nonetheless, other population-level studies have also identified COVID-19 protective effects of influenza vaccination [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ] and MMR vaccination [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], or more specifically, rubella vaccination [ 48 ]. Again, except for the Sambul et al [ 48 ] study, data were not controlled for possible confounding effects of receiving multiple vaccines within a similar timeframe, but in several controlled studies, neither MMR (or measles-containing and rubella-containing vaccines) nor influenza vaccine was associated with protection against COVID-19 case or death rates in population-wide studies [ 5 , 59 , 60 ].…”
This study examines the relationship of pneumococcal vaccination rates, influenza, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccinations (DTP), polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), and Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (tuberculosis) vaccination rates to COVID-19 case and death rates for 51 nations that have high rates of COVID-19 testing and for which nearly complete childhood, at-risk adult and elderly pneumococcal vaccination data were available. The study is unique in a large number of nations examined, the range of vaccine controls, in testing effects of combinations of vaccinations, and in examining the relationship of COVID-19 and vaccination rates to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Analysis of Italian regions and the states of the United States were also performed. Significant positive correlations were found between IPD (but not lower respiratory infections) and COVID-19 rates, while significant negative correlations were found between pneumococcal vaccination and COVID-19 rates. Influenza and MMR vaccination rates were negatively correlated with lower respiratory infection (LRI) rates and may synergize with pneumococcal vaccination rates to protect against COVID-19. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates were independent of other vaccination rates. These results suggest that endemic rates of bacterial pneumonias, for which pneumococci are a sentinel, may set regional and national susceptibility to severe COVID-19 disease and death.
“…22 Another study examined influenza vaccination data from 34 countries (using Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development data) with COVID-19 mortality from worldometer data and reported a negative correlation between influenza vaccination status and COVID-19 mortality (R 2 0.338). 17 These studies were limited by the use of aggregated data, however. Two retrospective studies using patient-level data include a large Italian cohort study in which receipt of influenza vaccination was associated with 11% lower odds of COVID-19 diagnosis, and among a subgroup of those aged ≥65 years vaccinated in the first half of the vaccination programme, a 44% and 30% lower odds of hospitalisation and mortality, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
IntroductionRecent evidence suggests that influenza vaccination may offer protection against COVID-19 severity. Our aim was to quantify the association between influenza vaccination status and risk of hospitalisation or all-cause mortality in people diagnosed with COVID-19.MethodsA retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health records from patients registered to a General Practitioner (GP) practice in South West England within the Electronic Care and Health Information Analytics database. The cohort included 6921 people with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic (1 January–31 July 2020). Data on influenza vaccination, hospitalisation and all-cause mortality were ascertained through linked clinical and demographic records. We applied propensity score methods (stabilised inverse probability of treatment weight) to quantify the association between influenza vaccination status and COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation or all-cause mortality).Results2613 (38%) participants received an influenza vaccination between 1 January 2019 and COVID-19 diagnosis. Receipt of influenza vaccination was associated with a significantly lower odds of hospitalisation or all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97, p=0.02), and 24% reduced odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90).DiscussionInfluenza vaccination was associated with a 15%–24% lower odds of severe COVID-19 outcomes. The current UK influenza vaccination programme needs urgent expansion as an integral component of the ongoing response plans to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“…Based on the assumptions, Del Riccio et al [11] conducted a systematic review and found that there was overall no evidence to suggest a negative impact of influenza vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 related infections, illness, or deaths, while some of the included studies even reported significantly inverse associations. Though some of the recent studies have found that influenza vaccine uptake was negatively associated with COVID-19 incidence [12,13], severity [13,14], and mortality [13,15], others showed no evidence of such associations [16][17][18]. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection and its outcomes is needed to provide conclusive evidence.…”
Influenza could circulate in parallel with COVID-19. In the context of COVID-19, some studies observed inverse associations between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical outcomes, while others did not. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical outcomes, aiming to provide evidence for COVID-19 prevention and vaccination promotion. We searched four databases from inception to 10 March, 2021. Random effects and fixed effects models were used to pool odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used funnel plots to evaluate the publication bias, I2 statistics to evaluate the heterogeneity, and conducted subgroup analyses. Sixteen observational studies involving 290,327 participants were included. Influenza vaccination was associated with a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (pooled adjusted OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.81–0.91), while not significantly associated with adverse outcomes (intensive care: adjusted OR 0.63, 95%CI: 0.22–1.81; hospitalization: adjusted OR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.51–1.06; mortality: adjusted OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.73–1.09). Our findings suggest that influenza vaccination is associated with a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is crucial for policy makers to implement strategies on influenza vaccination, for it may also have benefits for COVID-19 prevention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.