2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering environmental impacts of energy storage technologies: A life cycle assessment of power-to-gas business models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that hydrogen dominates the operating costs. These results are in the range provided by Peters et al, [124] and Panzone et al [125] Tschiggerl et al [126] has recently evaluated the environmental impacts of several power-to-gas business models. Results of the impact assessment indicate that the source of energy is the key aspect for the environmental performance.…”
Section: Methanesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that hydrogen dominates the operating costs. These results are in the range provided by Peters et al, [124] and Panzone et al [125] Tschiggerl et al [126] has recently evaluated the environmental impacts of several power-to-gas business models. Results of the impact assessment indicate that the source of energy is the key aspect for the environmental performance.…”
Section: Methanesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Tschiggerl et al [ 126 ] has recently evaluated the environmental impacts of several power‐to‐gas business models. Results of the impact assessment indicate that the source of energy is the key aspect for the environmental performance.…”
Section: Techno‐economic Feasibility Sustainability and Social Perception Of Co2 Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of the PtSNG option are [6][7][8][9][10]: (i) the use of existing infrastructure, (ii) high energy density (methane has >1000 kWh/m 3 while hydrogen has 270 kWh/m 3 [7]) and the less stringent safety constraints, and (iii) long-term and large-scale storage. The main disadvantages of the PtSNG technology are a relatively low efficiency and high investment management costs, also due to the limited operating hours of the plants [3,10,11].…”
Section: Background and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the fluctuating behavior of the input energy source, the nominal efficiencies are not sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the plant, but it is necessary to evaluate the annual performance [10]. This is defined as the ratio of usable system energy output to overall system energy input (electricity and possibly heat) [10,11]. Therefore, the annual efficiencies of the energy conversion units and the annual overall efficiency are calculated as the nominal efficiencies, by replacing the power with the energy (electric or chemical) consumed or generated in 1 year of operation.…”
Section: Performance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge on how shipping technologies affect human health has been brought into focus in recent years, 32 but assessments of health impacts from the production and use of electro-fuels are not commonly available in the scientic literature with only few studies performed. [53][54][55][56] Some studies are available which quanties environmental impacts from use of electro-fuels in the transport sector. [57][58][59][60][61] However, these studies focus on road vehicles and no studies have been published assessing electro-fuels used in shipping from a life cycle perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%