2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considering Bacteria-Sediment Associations in Microbial Fate and Transport Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disagreement also exists among the methods used to mathematically represent bacterial attachment: Bai and Lung () and more recently Russo et al . () assumed attachment occurs as a linear and reversible adsorption process based on previous studies (Scholl and Harvey ; Chapra ), while Jamieson et al . () argued that irreversible adsorption is more representative of attachment in low‐ionic strength freshwater systems.…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disagreement also exists among the methods used to mathematically represent bacterial attachment: Bai and Lung () and more recently Russo et al . () assumed attachment occurs as a linear and reversible adsorption process based on previous studies (Scholl and Harvey ; Chapra ), while Jamieson et al . () argued that irreversible adsorption is more representative of attachment in low‐ionic strength freshwater systems.…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing models generally perform poorly when predicting environmental fate and transport of micro‐organisms, and one reason is the lack of understanding regarding the movement of organisms and interactions with environmental particles (Russo et al . ). Previous researchers have provided comprehensive reviews of the presence of pathogens in a range of water systems (Pandey et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Russo et al (2011) observed a minor influence of resuspension on waterborne coliforms in a slow-moving stream and speculated that waterborne E. coli was dominated by catchment sources. At Stn6, E. coli strains from fecal sources in the catchment averaged 2% of the waterborne E. coli population, while E. coli observed in the tile drainage effluents from the adjacent field comprised 14% of the waterborne E. coli.…”
Section: Comparative Contribution Of Sediment Versus Catchment Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most water quality modeling studies assume that the exchange of E. coli at the sediment-water interface results from the suspension and transport of sediment particles, where FIB are irreversibly attached (Cho et al, 2010;Gao et al, 2011;Pandey et al, 2012;Russo et al, 2011). Pachepsky and Shelton (2011) recognized that sole reliance on sediment transport relationships to waterborne E. coli is a deficiency in such watershed models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there has been an increased effort to understand the effects of environmental changes on sediment yield [BORAH et al 2001;DE VENTE et al 2008;GUZMAN et al 2017;KUMAR et al 2014;PAK et al 2015;ZEINIVAND, SMEDT 2009;ZHANG et al 2013]. Some studies linked sediment yield with climate change [ZHANG et al 2016], water quality [BAI, WU--SENG 2005;RUSSO et al 2011], wildfire [CANFIELD et al 2005], aquatic life [PAPANICOLAOU, ABACI 2005], soil condition [FOX, MARTIN 2014;ZHANG et al 2016], and type of climate [MEKONNEN et al 2016]. However, recent Studies have shown that a planned land-use can be an effective management tool for soil conservation and reduction of sediment at a watershed scale [XIAO et al 2016;ZHAO et al 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%