1986
DOI: 10.3109/09593988609037745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for staff involved in amputee rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ham and Richardson evaluated their redesign through feedback from over 30 patients with no additional details provided. 10 Kirby and Bruce used a focus group with 16 rehabilitation professionals to evaluate existing designs and develop the design criteria that were used to guide the design of a modified slot-board residual limb support. 7 Kirby et al subsequently performed a short-term evaluation of the design involving observation and interviews with 7 participants who trialed the modified slot-board residual limb support for a day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Ham and Richardson evaluated their redesign through feedback from over 30 patients with no additional details provided. 10 Kirby and Bruce used a focus group with 16 rehabilitation professionals to evaluate existing designs and develop the design criteria that were used to guide the design of a modified slot-board residual limb support. 7 Kirby et al subsequently performed a short-term evaluation of the design involving observation and interviews with 7 participants who trialed the modified slot-board residual limb support for a day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 51 texts, 29 did not meet the inclusion criteria, either because there was no mention of residual limb supports (n 5 27) or there was only a minor mention of residual limb supports and no evaluation (n 5 2). The remaining 22 documents that met the inclusion criteria were grouped according to the type of publication: original research papers (n 5 5), 6,7,9,10,15 guidelines (group or individual expert opinion on the rehabilitation care of lower-limb amputees) (n 5 15), [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and systematic literature reviews (n 5 2). 31,32 In Table 1, we provide the objectives, methods, results, and implications extracted from each of the research papers.…”
Section: Scoping Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations