2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation of mRNA and Protein Expression during Development of C. elegans

Abstract: Spatiotemporal control of gene expression is crucial for development and subject to evolutionary changes. Although proteins are the final product of most genes, the developmental proteome of an animal has not yet been comprehensively defined, and the correlation between mRNA and protein abundance during development is largely unknown. Here, we globally measured and compared protein and mRNA expression changes during the life cycle of the nematodes C. elegans and C. briggsae, separated by ~30 million years of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

17
107
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
17
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall correlations for both protein and mRNA abundances were close to one between the strains. This is consistent with the quantitative comparison of C. elegans and C. briggsae (27), but it is different for C. elegans and D. melanogaster, where the conservation in expression was found only on protein level (26). Thus, in this intraspecies comparison, we observed a strong selective pressure to maintain protein levels, an effect that was also shown for closely (27) and even distantly related species (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall correlations for both protein and mRNA abundances were close to one between the strains. This is consistent with the quantitative comparison of C. elegans and C. briggsae (27), but it is different for C. elegans and D. melanogaster, where the conservation in expression was found only on protein level (26). Thus, in this intraspecies comparison, we observed a strong selective pressure to maintain protein levels, an effect that was also shown for closely (27) and even distantly related species (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…More than 1,400 proteins were reliably quantified in worm samples using size exclusion chromatography (28), and 3,470 proteins were quantified using LysC digestion followed by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography separation of the peptides (29). Between 1,461 and 4,072 proteins were identified in different developmental stages of C. elegans and C. briggsae after separation on SDS gels (27). To quantify less abundant proteins, additional separation methods would be required, as was done for the quantitative comparison of distantly related species (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 The DLK-1 promoter (~2 kb upstream from the TSS) contains binding sites for LIN-14, 26 UNC-30 8 and UNC-55, 8 suggesting possible regulation by these transcription factors. DLK-1 transcript levels are globally upregulated from mid L1-L2 stage, 27 and a pulse of DLK-1 at the onset of DD remodeling facilitates new synapse formation. 22 DLK-1 localizes to the perisynaptic region in adult DD neurons, 28 and promotes MT growth and growth cone formation in regenerating axons.…”
Section: The Cellular Changes That Facilitate Dd Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mRNAs are further translated into proteins, which perform the actual cellular functions. It has been shown in multiple species such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Griffin et al 2002), Trypanosoma brucei (Butter et al 2013), Caenorhabditis elegans (Grün et al 2014), and human (Schwanhäusser et al 2011), as well as in Drosophila melanogaster (Bonaldi et al 2008), that transcript levels are only a moderate predictor for protein expression as they do not account for post-transcriptional processes such as translational regulation or protein stability (Vogel and Marcotte 2012;Liu et al 2016). Recently, this has also been addressed with a developmental perspective in Caenorhabditis elegans (Grün et al 2014), Xenopus laevis (Peshkin et al 2015), and Trypanosoma brucei (Dejung et al 2016), but not yet in Drosophila.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%