2014
DOI: 10.5334/jcms.1021215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation in Museums and Inclusion of the Non-Professional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2008, the International Council of Museums -Committee for Conservation adopted a definition of conservation as 'all measures and actions aimed at safeguarding tangible cultural heritage while ensuring its accessibility to present and future generations' (ICOM-CC 2008). Conservation literature engaging with questions of access explores the ability of conservators to enable object-handling in institutions through touch (Candlin 2010;Chatterjee 2010), and the emphasises the social benefits of conservation for non-professionals (Saunders 2014). While a strong basis has been established for increasing access in relation to objects in cultural institutions, there is a need to consider the accessibility of conservation resources outside of these institutions.…”
Section: Accessibility In Conservation Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, the International Council of Museums -Committee for Conservation adopted a definition of conservation as 'all measures and actions aimed at safeguarding tangible cultural heritage while ensuring its accessibility to present and future generations' (ICOM-CC 2008). Conservation literature engaging with questions of access explores the ability of conservators to enable object-handling in institutions through touch (Candlin 2010;Chatterjee 2010), and the emphasises the social benefits of conservation for non-professionals (Saunders 2014). While a strong basis has been established for increasing access in relation to objects in cultural institutions, there is a need to consider the accessibility of conservation resources outside of these institutions.…”
Section: Accessibility In Conservation Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2005 report by Whitmore et al identifies “educational activities that will exploit the appeal of conservation to engage and train students in science” as one of the “four areas of particular need in conservation science”. Saunders states that public involvement in conservation is a “positive act of engagement” that can “solidify common values and nurture a collective sense of responsibility”. Making heritage science more accessible through the use of consumer technology is one way to achieve this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of non-ocularcentric examination of objects in material culture studies versus the examination of objects by sighted researchers could lead to new insights and narratives. The findings can perhaps be used to compare the value of new knowledge gained through non-ocularcentric examination practices versus the value of object preservation and conservation (Saunders, 2014). This comparison can contribute to the literature about the management of cultural heritage that suggests an object must have some other purpose beyond being conserved.…”
Section: Multisensory Object Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions can be performed in part through the research of ethnographic traditions, natural sciences, and material culture. Their values have transformed and continue to transform together with the changes in society and their needs (Abt, 2007;Papadimitriou, N., Plati, M., Markou, E., & Catapoti, D., 2016;Saunders, 2014).…”
Section: The Evolution Of Museums and Their Transforming Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation