2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of the interaction between nutrients and plant secondary metabolites on herbivore selectivity: benefits or detriments for plants?

Abstract: Concentrations of nutrients and plant secondary metabolites (PSM) vary temporally and spatially, creating a multidimensional feeding environment. Interactions between nutrients and PSM are poorly understood because research has relied largely on studying the isolated effects of nutrients or PSM on foraging behavior. Nevertheless, their interactions can influence food selection and the dynamics of plant communities. Our objective was to explore how interactions between nutrients and PSM influence food selection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(86 reference statements)
6
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both nutrient and defensive compound uptake are likely to influence herbivore preference nonlinearly (Slansky and Wheeler 1992, Behmer et al 2002, Villalba et al 2002. Host species did not affect herbivory on Indian paintbrush in this study, despite strong effects of alkaloid uptake on Indian paintbrush herbivory at the same site in the previous year (Adler 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Both nutrient and defensive compound uptake are likely to influence herbivore preference nonlinearly (Slansky and Wheeler 1992, Behmer et al 2002, Villalba et al 2002. Host species did not affect herbivory on Indian paintbrush in this study, despite strong effects of alkaloid uptake on Indian paintbrush herbivory at the same site in the previous year (Adler 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, temporal changes in preference -even when in the aforementioned range -are indicative of the impact of nutrients and toxins on food selection by herbivores (Villalba et al, 2002b). This is relevant in situations, like in this study, when differences in the nutrient profile of food alternatives were small or when the concentration of ergovaline in the forage was below toxic levels (Lyman et al, 2008;Bernard et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation and supplemental nutrients allowed the animals to better cope with secondary compounds and to feed more readily on Mediterranean shrubs. Without supplemental nutrients, secondary compounds have considerable negative effects on the intake of shrubs, although the mechanisms are not well known (Villalba et al, 2002c). Generally, in our study, goats fed with secondary compound-rich shrubs benefited from eating barley, which suggests that energy from supplements is likely to influence the intake and preference for shrubs in goats browsing on Mediterranean bush-lands.…”
Section: Effect Of Barley Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 76%