Abstract:Abstract:Retrotransposons can have significant influences on gene expression and genome stability through their ability to integrate reverse-transcript copies of their sequences at new genomic locations by retrotransposition. These elements have been long known to retrotranspose in mammalian germ cells to give rise to inherited insertion alleles, but more recent work has also shown that retrotransposition can occur in mammalian somatic cells, particularly in brain tissue and tumors. Retrotransposition makes ap… Show more
“…Besides the consequences of retrotransposition (e.g . insertional mutagenesis, creation of new alternative splicing sites, promoting sequence transduction from the donor to new insertion sites) ( 3 ), L1 retrotransposons can also interfere with the transcriptional activity of the surrounding genomic sequences from their bidirectional promoter. Specifically, in addition to the sense promoter, the 5′ UTR of evolutionarily recent L1s also contain an anti-sense promoter (L1-ASP) that can produce transcripts from the 5′ UTR in antisense orientation to the adjacent genomic region.…”
Besides the consequences of retrotransposition, long interspersed element 1 (L1) retrotransposons can affect the host genome through their antisense promoter. In addition to the sense promoter, the evolutionarily recent L1 retrotransposons, which are present in several thousand copies, also possess an anti-sense promoter that can produce L1 chimeric transcripts (LCT) composed of the L1 5’ UTR followed by the adjacent genomic sequence. The full extent to which LCT expression occurs in a given tissue and whether disruption of the defense mechanisms that normally control L1 retrotransposons affects their expression and function in cancer cells, remain to be established. By using CLIFinder, a dedicated bioinformatics tool, we found that LCT expression was widespread in normal brain and aggressive glioma samples, and that approximately 17% of recent L1 retrotransposons, from the L1PA1 to L1PA7 subfamilies, were involved in their production. Importantly, the transcriptional activities of the L1 antisense promoters and of their host loci were coupled. Accordingly, we detected LCT-producing L1 retrotransposons mainly in transcriptionally active genes and genomic loci. Moreover, changes in the host genomic locus expression level in glioma were associated with a similar change in LCT expression level, regardless of the L1 promoter methylation status. Our findings support a model in which the host genomic locus transcriptional activity is the main driving force of LCT expression. We hypothesize that this model is more applicable when host gene and LCT are transcribed from the same strand.
“…Besides the consequences of retrotransposition (e.g . insertional mutagenesis, creation of new alternative splicing sites, promoting sequence transduction from the donor to new insertion sites) ( 3 ), L1 retrotransposons can also interfere with the transcriptional activity of the surrounding genomic sequences from their bidirectional promoter. Specifically, in addition to the sense promoter, the 5′ UTR of evolutionarily recent L1s also contain an anti-sense promoter (L1-ASP) that can produce transcripts from the 5′ UTR in antisense orientation to the adjacent genomic region.…”
Besides the consequences of retrotransposition, long interspersed element 1 (L1) retrotransposons can affect the host genome through their antisense promoter. In addition to the sense promoter, the evolutionarily recent L1 retrotransposons, which are present in several thousand copies, also possess an anti-sense promoter that can produce L1 chimeric transcripts (LCT) composed of the L1 5’ UTR followed by the adjacent genomic sequence. The full extent to which LCT expression occurs in a given tissue and whether disruption of the defense mechanisms that normally control L1 retrotransposons affects their expression and function in cancer cells, remain to be established. By using CLIFinder, a dedicated bioinformatics tool, we found that LCT expression was widespread in normal brain and aggressive glioma samples, and that approximately 17% of recent L1 retrotransposons, from the L1PA1 to L1PA7 subfamilies, were involved in their production. Importantly, the transcriptional activities of the L1 antisense promoters and of their host loci were coupled. Accordingly, we detected LCT-producing L1 retrotransposons mainly in transcriptionally active genes and genomic loci. Moreover, changes in the host genomic locus expression level in glioma were associated with a similar change in LCT expression level, regardless of the L1 promoter methylation status. Our findings support a model in which the host genomic locus transcriptional activity is the main driving force of LCT expression. We hypothesize that this model is more applicable when host gene and LCT are transcribed from the same strand.
“…) (Miki et al. ; Chan and Cheng ), retrotransposition (Maxwell ), or alternative splicing to eventually become a gene family. Whole‐genome duplication ( WGD ) has been considered as the most common mechanism resulting in the diversification of ligand and receptor gene families (Taylor et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation of heterotrimeric G protein mediates the actions of signaling proteins such as neuroendocrine peptides by allowing the translation of extracellular signals into the intracellular space (Kaiya et al 2008(Kaiya et al , 2014a. Receptors and their peptide ligands originated from common ancestral genes and may have diversified through gene duplication (Meyer and Schartl 1999;Meijer et al 2007) (Miki et al 1992;Chan and Cheng 2004), retrotransposition (Maxwell 2014), or alternative splicing to eventually become a gene family. Whole-genome duplication (WGD) has been considered as the most common mechanism resulting in the diversification of ligand and receptor gene families (Taylor et al 2003).…”
The gut hormone ghrelin is involved in numerous metabolic functions, such as the stimulation of growth hormone secretion, gastric motility, and food intake. Ghrelin is modified by ghrelin O‐acyltransferase (GOAT) or membrane‐bound O‐acyltransferase domain‐containing 4 (MBOAT4) enabling action through the growth hormone secretagogue receptors (GHS‐R). During the course of evolution, initially strong ligand/receptor specificities can be disrupted by genomic changes, potentially modifying physiological roles of the ligand/receptor system. Here, we investigated the coevolution of ghrelin, GOAT, and GHS‐R in vertebrates. We combined similarity search, conserved synteny analyses, phylogenetic reconstructions, and protein structure comparisons to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the ghrelin system. Ghrelin remained a single‐gene locus in all vertebrate species, and accordingly, a single GHS‐R isoform was identified in all tetrapods. Similar patterns of the nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) ratio (dN/dS) in the vertebrate lineage strongly suggest coevolution of the ghrelin and GHS‐R genes, supporting specific functional interactions and common physiological pathways. The selection profiles do not allow confirmation as to whether ghrelin binds specifically to GOAT, but the ghrelin dN/dS patterns are more similar to those of GOAT compared to MBOAT1 and MBOAT2 isoforms. Four GHS‐R isoforms were identified in teleost genomes. This diversification of GHS‐R resulted from successive rounds of duplications, some of which remained specific to the teleost lineage. Coevolution signals are lost in teleosts, presumably due to the diversification of GHS‐R but not the ghrelin gene. The identification of the GHS‐R diversity in teleosts provides a molecular basis for comparative studies on ghrelin's physiological roles and regulation, while the comparative sequence and structure analyses will assist translational medicine to determine structure–function relationships of the ghrelin/GHS‐R system.
“…Στα ανθρώπινα έμβρυα παρατηρείται από το στάδιο των 8 του κάθε cDNA κλώνου, στη θέση στόχο. Η προσθήκη και η σύνδεση των νουκλεοτιδίων στα κενά που σχηματίζονται στα 5΄άκρα, πραγματοποιούνται από τη δράση των πρωτεϊνικών μηχανισμών του κυττάρου(49). Παρά το μικρό αριθμό αντιγράφων τους, η παρουσία τους φαίνεται να είναι απαραίτητη για το κύτταρο, καθώς για παράδειγμα τα LINEs-2 στοιχεία θεωρείται ότι αποσιωπούν ειδικά και ισχυρά τα Τκύτταρα(55).…”
Τα ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία αποτελούν επαναλαμβανόμενες ακολουθίες DNA και απαντώνται σε πολλά αντίγραφα στο γένωμα όλων των οργανισμών. Λόγω της ικανότητάς του να μετακινούνται και να αυξάνουν τον αριθμό αντιγράφων τους, έχουν διαδραματίσει σημαντικό ρόλο στη δομή, τη λειτουργία και την εξέλιξη του γενώματος των ευκαρυωτικών οργανισμών. Ωστόσο, από το σύνολο των ρετρομεταθετών στοιχείων, λόγω συσσώρευσης μεταλλάξεων, μόνο ένας μικρός αριθμός από αυτά έχει παραμείνει ενεργός. Γεγονότα ρετρομετάθεσης έχουν παρατηρηθεί σε γαμετικά κύτταρα, σε καρκινικά κύτταρα, σε νευρικά κύτταρα εγκεφάλου και σε πρώιμα στάδια εμβρυϊκής ανάπτυξης. Τα κύτταρα ελέγχουν την έκφραση των ρετρομεταθετών στοιχείων μέσω μηχανισμών, όπως η μεθυλίωση του DNA και ο μεταμεταγραφικός έλεγχος που ασκούν τα μικρά, μη-κωδικά μόρια RNAi, για να εξασφαλίζουν τη δομική και τη λειτουργική ακεραιότητα του γενώματός τους. Σκοπός της ερευνητικής εργασίας αποτέλεσε η μελέτη της παρουσίας των γεγονότων ρετρομετάθεσης στο εσωτερικό ώριμων σπερματοζωαρίων και η μελέτη του ρόλου των ρετρομεταθετών στοιχείων στη φυσιολογική πορεία της προεμφυτευτικής ανάπτυξης εμβρύων μυός. Ταυτόχρονα, μελετήθηκε η επίδραση της αναστολής του ενζύμου της ανάστροφης μεταγραφάσης στη γαμετογένεση και στην in vitro πρώιμη εμβρυϊκή ανάπτυξη. Για τη μελέτη των γεγονότων ρετρομετάθεσης χρησιμοποιήθηκαν πλασμιδιακοί φορείς που φέρουν κλωνοποιημένα τα ανθρώπινα ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία LINE-1, τα ανθρώπινα ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία HERVK-10 και τα ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία του μυός, VL30. Τα υπό μελέτη στοιχεία φέρουν ενσωματωμένη ειδική κασέτα ανίχνευσης των γεγονότων ρετρομετάθεσης, η οποία στηρίζεται στην έκφραση της EGFP. Οι εξωγενείς πλασμιδιακοί φορείς δεσμεύονται αυθόρμητα από τα σπερματοζωάρια και ενσωματώνονται στο εσωτερικό τους, και μέσω in vitro γονιμοποίησης, μεταφέρονται παθητικά από τα σπερματοζωάρια στα ωάρια. Για τη μελέτη της αναστολής του ενζύμου της ανάστροφης μεταγραφάσης, χρησιμοποιήθηκαν οι αναστολείς Lamivudine και Nevirapine, οι οποίοι χορηγήθηκαν σε αρσενικούς και θηλυκούς μύες, για διάστημα 10 εβδομάδων. Προστέθηκαν επίσης στο καλλιεργητικό μέσο ανάπτυξης των εμβρύων και μελετήθηκε ο ρόλος τους στην φυσιολογική προεμφυτευτική πορεία των εμβρύων μυός. Τα αποτελέσματά μας δείχνουν πως α. τα σπερματοζωάρια ενσωματώνουν τα εξωγενή ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία και ευνοούν την παρουσία γεγονότων ρετρομετάθεσης β. τα σπερματοζωάρια μεταφέρουν τα εξωγενή ρετρομεταθετά στοιχεία στα ωάρια μέσω της γονιμοποίησης γ. η υπερέκφραση των ρετρομεταθετών στοιχείων επηρεάζει τη φυσιολογική πορεία της πρώιμης ανάπτυξης εμβρύων μυός δ. η αναστολή του ενζύμου της ανάστροφης μεταγραφάσης επηρεάζει τη φυσιολογική πορεία της σπερματογένεσης και της ωογένεσης, καθώς και τη φυσιολογική προεμφυτευτική ανάπτυξη εμβρύων μυός.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.