Consequences of Intermodality Registration Errors for Intramodality 3D Ultrasound IGRT

Abstract

Intramodality ultrasound image-guided radiotherapy systems compare daily ultrasound to reference ultrasound images. Nevertheless, because the actual treatment planning is based on a reference computed tomography image, and not on a reference ultrasound image, their accuracy depends partially on the correct intermodality registration of the reference ultrasound and computed tomography images for treatment planning. The error propagation in daily patient positioning due to potential registration errors at the planning stage was assessed in this work. Five different scenarios were simulated involving shifts or rotations of ultrasound or computed tomography images. The consequences of several workflow procedures were tested with a phantom setup. As long as the reference ultrasound and computed tomography images are made to match, the patient will be in the correct treatment position. In an example with a phantom measurement, the accuracy of the performed manual fusion was found to be 2 mm. In clinical practice, manual registration of patient images is expected to be more difficult. Uncorrected mismatches will lead to a systematically incorrect final patient position because there will be no indication that there was a misregistration between the computed tomography and reference ultrasound images. In the treatment room, the fusion with the computed tomography image will not be visible and based on the ultrasound images the patient position seems correct.

The Use of Ultrasound Imaging in the External Beam Radiotherapy Workflow of Prostate Cancer Patients

“…Van der Meer et al [ 89 ] simulated five different scenarios mimicking the errors that could occur when using the Clarity system for TAUS image guidance. These errors could be due to, for example, the above-mentioned inaccurate calibration, but also due to laser offsets or patient motion between the simulation CT and simulation US image acquisition.…”

Simulation of pseudo‐CT images based on deformable image registration of ultrasound images: A proof of concept for transabdominal ultrasound imaging of the prostate during radiotherapy

“…Both scans were performed in the same supine patient position, stabilized with knee fix and foot support (Combifix, Civco Medical Solutions, Kalona, IA, USA), resulting in a correct automatic fusion of the US and CT images. 19 In all US images, the prostate was delineated. All CT images had delineations of the body contour, prostate, seminal vesiculae (SV, except for patient 3), anus, rectum, and bladder (except for patient 1).…”

Radiolucent 4D Ultrasound Imaging: System Design and Application to Radiotherapy Guidance

“…1), and thus with existing probes, CT/CBCT and US images must be collected non-synchronously. Any patient anatomy movement between collection of CT/CBCT and US images negatively impacts the accuracy of tumor position estimates computed by the guidance system at the time of radiotherapy beam delivery [11]. In addition, since US probe pressure can cause anatomy deformation, lack of probe pressure during CT/CBCT acquisition can cause differentials in patient anatomy between planning/positioning and treatment phases, negatively impacting the actual dose delivered [12,13].…”