Reconciling Fundamental Social Rights and Economic Freedoms After Viking, Laval and Rüffert 2011
DOI: 10.5771/9783845232195-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences and policy perspectives in the Nordic countries as a result of certain important decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The judgments in Viking and Laval, for example, were shown to have had little impact outside Sweden, where Laval had originated, the peak employer organisation had supported the legal case against the unions and where a conservative-liberal government was broadly in favour of labour market reform, and the United Kingdom, where no statutory right to strike existed in the first place, unions were already faced with financial liabilities and now put even further on the defensive after the CJEU rulings (Bruun & Jonsson, 2010;Novitz & Syrpis, 2015).…”
Section: Pushback Through Containmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The judgments in Viking and Laval, for example, were shown to have had little impact outside Sweden, where Laval had originated, the peak employer organisation had supported the legal case against the unions and where a conservative-liberal government was broadly in favour of labour market reform, and the United Kingdom, where no statutory right to strike existed in the first place, unions were already faced with financial liabilities and now put even further on the defensive after the CJEU rulings (Bruun & Jonsson, 2010;Novitz & Syrpis, 2015).…”
Section: Pushback Through Containmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Danish industrial relations regime is very similar to the Swedish, and industrial action against foreign employers frequent. Yet, the CJEU's ruling in Laval had little impact (Bruun & Jonsson, 2010). Before the Laval judgment, the Danish judiciary had shielded national industrial relations from interference by EU law.…”
Section: Pushback Through Containmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main result of these efforts is that the impact of these judgments is heavily conditioned by the preferences of political parties and important interest groups, in particular employer associations. The judgments in Viking and Laval, for example, were shown to have had little impact outside Sweden, where Laval had originated, the peak employer organisation had supported the legal case against the unions and where a conservative-liberal government was broadly in favour of labour market reform, and the UK, where no statutory right to strike existed in the first place, unions were already faced with financial liabilities and now put even further on the defensive after the CJEU rulings (Bruun and Jonsson, 2010;Novitz and Syrpis, 2015).…”
Section: Pushback Through Containmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is much less industrial relations research into the Viking case, which may be related to the fact that the case was settled in a secret agreement, 106 and never had any legislative consequences in Finland. 107…”
Section: B) Viking -Eu Law Utilised To Destabilise An Agreement For Imentioning
confidence: 99%