“…The main result of these efforts is that the impact of these judgments is heavily conditioned by the preferences of political parties and important interest groups, in particular employer associations. The judgments in Viking and Laval, for example, were shown to have had little impact outside Sweden, where Laval had originated, the peak employer organisation had supported the legal case against the unions and where a conservative-liberal government was broadly in favour of labour market reform, and the UK, where no statutory right to strike existed in the first place, unions were already faced with financial liabilities and now put even further on the defensive after the CJEU rulings (Bruun and Jonsson, 2010;Novitz and Syrpis, 2015).…”