2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequence of total lepton number violation in strongly magnetized iron white dwarfs

Abstract: The influence of a neutrinoless electron to positron conversion on a cooling of strongly magnetized iron white dwarfs is studied. It is shown that they can be good candidates for soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(268 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we investigate the time evolution of massive, uniformly rotating, highly magnetized white dwarfs (WDs) when they lose angular momentum owing to magnetic dipole braking. We have different important reasons to perform such an investigation: 1) there is incontestable observational data on the existence of massive (M ∼ 1 M ) WDs with magnetic fields all the way to 10 9 G (see (Kepler et al 2015), and references therein); 2) WDs can rotate with periods as short as P ≈ 0.5 s (Boshkayev et al 2013b); 3) they can be formed in double WD mergers (García-Berro et al 2012;Rueda et al 2013;Kilic et al 2018); 4) they have been invoked to explain type Ia supernovae within the double degenerate scenario (Webbink 1984;Iben & Tutukov 1984); 5) they constitute a viable model to explain soft gamma-repeaters and anomalous Xray pulsars (Malheiro et al 2012;Boshkayev et al 2013a;Rueda et al 2013;Boshkayev et al 2015a;Belyaev et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we investigate the time evolution of massive, uniformly rotating, highly magnetized white dwarfs (WDs) when they lose angular momentum owing to magnetic dipole braking. We have different important reasons to perform such an investigation: 1) there is incontestable observational data on the existence of massive (M ∼ 1 M ) WDs with magnetic fields all the way to 10 9 G (see (Kepler et al 2015), and references therein); 2) WDs can rotate with periods as short as P ≈ 0.5 s (Boshkayev et al 2013b); 3) they can be formed in double WD mergers (García-Berro et al 2012;Rueda et al 2013;Kilic et al 2018); 4) they have been invoked to explain type Ia supernovae within the double degenerate scenario (Webbink 1984;Iben & Tutukov 1984); 5) they constitute a viable model to explain soft gamma-repeaters and anomalous Xray pulsars (Malheiro et al 2012;Boshkayev et al 2013a;Rueda et al 2013;Boshkayev et al 2015a;Belyaev et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such Super-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs could be possible progenitors of over-luminous type-Ia supernovae (Howell et al 2006;Hicken et al 2007;Yamanaka et al 2009;Scalzo et al 2010;Tanaka et al 2010;Silverman et al 2011;Taubenberger et al 2011). Several publications in the recent literature have addressed different aspects of this issue: for example, the effects of magnetic field on the equation of state (Das & Mukhopadhyay 2012;Manreza Paret et al 2015;Zou & Meng 2015;Mukhopadhyay et al 2015), Lorentz force and instability (Nityananda & Konar 2014;Coelho et al 2014), possibility of electron capture (Chamel et al 2013(Chamel et al , 2014Vishal & Mukhopadhyay 2014) and total lepton number violation (Belyaev et al 2015). In an earlier work (hereafter P1, Bera & Bhattacharya (2014)) we have presented the massradius relation of strongly magnetized white dwarfs with self consistent inclusion of Lorentz force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-Chandrasekhar limiting-mass WDs were believed to be formed by merging two sub-Chandrasekhar mass WDs (double-degenerate scenario), leading to another sub-Chandrasekhar mass WD, exploding due to accretion of a helium layer (Hillebrandt & Niemeyer 2000;Pakmor et al 2010). On the other hand, the super-Chandrasekhar WDs were often explained by incorporating different physics, such as a double-degenerate scenario (Hicken et al 2007), presence of magnetic fields (Das & Mukhopadhyay 2013, presence of a differential rotation (Hachisu et al 2012), presence of charge in the WDs (Liu et al 2014), ungravity effect (Bertolami & Mariji 2016), lepton number violation in magnetized WD (Belyaev et al 2015), generalized Heisenberg uncertainty principle (Ong 2018), and many more. However, none of these theories can self-consistently explain both of the peculiar classes of WDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%