2005
DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus, Confusion, and Controversy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some forms may engage directly with the rights holder, for example through farm-by-farm land titling. Other forms of strengthening rights may be enacted at the national level, for example constitutional reforms in Mozambique that recognize customary rights to land (van den Brink et al 2006). National scale or even community level interventions that seek to strengthen rights may have differing impacts within populations, for example many interventions seeking to improve rights may lead to elite capture of benefits and subsequent loss of rights for poor and vulnerable sub-populations, particularly in the absence of safeguards (Besteman (1990).…”
Section: Description Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some forms may engage directly with the rights holder, for example through farm-by-farm land titling. Other forms of strengthening rights may be enacted at the national level, for example constitutional reforms in Mozambique that recognize customary rights to land (van den Brink et al 2006). National scale or even community level interventions that seek to strengthen rights may have differing impacts within populations, for example many interventions seeking to improve rights may lead to elite capture of benefits and subsequent loss of rights for poor and vulnerable sub-populations, particularly in the absence of safeguards (Besteman (1990).…”
Section: Description Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of paramount importance that productive land, including that in the hands of previously disadvantaged South Africans, remains productive to ensure that the land reform programme does not negatively impact the agriculture sector's performance and food security. The importance of empirical evidence in shaping the land reform policy agenda has long been acknowledged [23] and several strides have been made by a plethora of researchers in a bid to provide the much-needed input for policy formulation [22,24,25]. A significant share of existing literature focuses on evaluating the impact of land reform [19,22,24,26].…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some forms may engage directly with the rights holder, for example through farm-by-farm land titling. Other forms of strengthening rights may act on a national level, for example constitutional reforms in Mozambique that recognize customary rights to land (van den Brink et al 2006). National scale or even community level interventions that seek to strengthen rights may have differing impacts within populations, for example many interventions seeking to improve rights may lead to elite capture of benefits and subsequent loss of rights for poor and vulnerable subpopulations particularly in the absence of safeguards.…”
Section: Description Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%