Abstract:Resumo: Martin Heidegger desenvolveu uma análise da metafísica e da tecnologia que questionava radicalmente seus pressupostos ontológicos. Contudo, para Peter Sloterdijk, autor de uma revisão do motivo da clareira (Lichtung) heideggeriana intitulada Domesticação do ser: clarificando a clareira, Heidegger padece daquilo mesmo que ele critica: uma pendência para a ontologia clássica que, desde pelo menos Platão e Aristóteles, separa o ser e o nada, basila o princípio de bivalência na lógica, excluindo qualquer t… Show more
“…Сам же Слотердайк пояснял в последующих интервью, что «метафора "человекопарк" -это перефразированный Платон» [35]. Тем не менее очередная актуализация перспектив развития и взаимодействия человека и техники привела к освоению нового проблемного поля, сформулированного как «кибернетическая антропология» [36], и способствовала продолжению исследований и дискуссий вокруг антропотехник [37] и анти-антропоцентризма [38].…”
The study represents the author’s interpretation of the concept by P. Sloterdijk. The spherological ap-proach allows us to expand the boundaries of hu-man understanding through the convergence of psychology, phenomenology and philosophical anthropology. The origins of spherology as an ele-ment of vital geometry could be found in Antique Philosophy and is further represented in culture reflecting the fundamental aspects of human exist-ence. P. Sloterdijk’s spherological concept allows us to explore the dimension of internal spatiality of a person reconstructing the concept of intimacy. Mi-crospherology and macrospherology are becoming modes of human existence, and spherological to-pology takes place as a space of intimacy solely. The phenomenon of sphere-formation is considered by P. Sloterdijk through the prism of extrapolation of the natural to the artificial. In fact, the need to recre-ate a comfortable protective space is a way of self-preservation, which is immanently inherent in a per-son. The process of sphere-formation is a recon-struction of the first spherological defense obtained from pre-personal dyadic experience. Since spher-ological spaces are constituted by subjects, the philosophical question about man within the framework of spherology is the decentralization of the individual and the recultivation of implicit dyadic connections. The spherological approach allows us to re-evaluate the formation of society history, the development of art and the morphology of human thinking.
“…Сам же Слотердайк пояснял в последующих интервью, что «метафора "человекопарк" -это перефразированный Платон» [35]. Тем не менее очередная актуализация перспектив развития и взаимодействия человека и техники привела к освоению нового проблемного поля, сформулированного как «кибернетическая антропология» [36], и способствовала продолжению исследований и дискуссий вокруг антропотехник [37] и анти-антропоцентризма [38].…”
The study represents the author’s interpretation of the concept by P. Sloterdijk. The spherological ap-proach allows us to expand the boundaries of hu-man understanding through the convergence of psychology, phenomenology and philosophical anthropology. The origins of spherology as an ele-ment of vital geometry could be found in Antique Philosophy and is further represented in culture reflecting the fundamental aspects of human exist-ence. P. Sloterdijk’s spherological concept allows us to explore the dimension of internal spatiality of a person reconstructing the concept of intimacy. Mi-crospherology and macrospherology are becoming modes of human existence, and spherological to-pology takes place as a space of intimacy solely. The phenomenon of sphere-formation is considered by P. Sloterdijk through the prism of extrapolation of the natural to the artificial. In fact, the need to recre-ate a comfortable protective space is a way of self-preservation, which is immanently inherent in a per-son. The process of sphere-formation is a recon-struction of the first spherological defense obtained from pre-personal dyadic experience. Since spher-ological spaces are constituted by subjects, the philosophical question about man within the framework of spherology is the decentralization of the individual and the recultivation of implicit dyadic connections. The spherological approach allows us to re-evaluate the formation of society history, the development of art and the morphology of human thinking.
Цель исследования -проанализировать лиминальные и транзитные пространства в аспекте мобильности. На основании теоретических концепций философов и практических работ социологов и антропологов в статье формулируются ключевые подходы к описанию лиминальных и транзитных пространств, выявляется их специфика в рамках антропологии мобильности, исходя из полиформизма повседневных мобильных практик индивида. Научная новизна исследования заключается в проведении демаркации понятий «лиминальное пространство» и «транзитное пространство» в контексте мобильности. В результате исследования продемонстрирована специфика пространственного модуса лиминальности, произведена дифференциация лиминальных пространств и транзитных пространств в мобильных практиках.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.