2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectors as a risk factor for blood-associated infections (3-way stopcock and needleless connector): A randomized-experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also thank Devrim for expressing concern and interest in our article. 1 In our study, "Results of this study found no significant difference between rates of colonization in NCs and TWSs," this sentence was perceived as a contradiction. This contradiction was explained in the letter by Devrim.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also thank Devrim for expressing concern and interest in our article. 1 In our study, "Results of this study found no significant difference between rates of colonization in NCs and TWSs," this sentence was perceived as a contradiction. This contradiction was explained in the letter by Devrim.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We read with interest the recent article by Sengul et al, 1 "Connectors as a risk factor for blood-associated infections (3-way stopcock and needleless connector): a randomized-experimental study." The authors have performed an valuable work with the concept of "randomized-experimental study," including adult patients with central, port, and peripheral catheters with needleless connector (NC) and 3way stopcock (TWS).…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La desinfección de los puertos, desatendida en el 31.4% del personal de enfermería, al momento de realizar cualquier procedimiento es importante porque se ha demostrado que su omisión permite el desarrollo de microorganismos 18 , favoreciendo la colonización bacteriana en pacientes hospitalizados 19 , además de que en servicios de cuidados críticos y hospitalización resulta ser un procedimiento muy habitual por la carga de medicamentos que ingresan al paciente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…According to literature, there was no difference between two types of connectors on the development of CRBSI. [9][10][11] Also there are studies that NFCs are much safer in reducing the risk for infection. 8,[12][13][14][15] If aseptic techniques were not used, needleless systems may be a risk factor for CRBSI for all types of catheters.…”
Section: Anah Tar Ke LI Me Ler: Kateter Ilişkili Enfeksiyonlar; Perif...mentioning
confidence: 99%