1988
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(88)90764-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connection rule of envelope functions at heterointerface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, this is equivalent to the decoupled band approximation leading to (2). But contrary to (6) the envelope function is not continuous in [11 to 131. This point will be discussed in the next section in connection with energy-dependent masses.…”
Section: Two Standard Approachesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In principle, this is equivalent to the decoupled band approximation leading to (2). But contrary to (6) the envelope function is not continuous in [11 to 131. This point will be discussed in the next section in connection with energy-dependent masses.…”
Section: Two Standard Approachesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…An agreement of the calculated 1 IO meV GPa-' (6&) is only weakly pressure dependent) with experiment is not necessarily expected both because of the uncertainties in a: and a: (experimentally one typically measures the shift of band gap with pressure, which is proportional to ( -a , + a"), rather than a, or a, separately), and because of the limitations of our model, which neglects band hybridization in the conduction band (Akera et al 1988).…”
Section: E%)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The simulation solves the Schrö dinger equation using the envelope function approximation [3] with appropriate boundary conditions [31]. Effects of strain are also taken into account where needed.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%