2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjunctival Myxoid Lesions: Clinical-Pathologic Multiparametric Analysis, Including Molecular Genetics (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few case reports followed confirming those associations [19, 20]. Other ocular lesions seen in patients with CNC are conjunctival myxomas [7, 21, 22] and rarely uveal melanotic schwannomas [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few case reports followed confirming those associations [19, 20]. Other ocular lesions seen in patients with CNC are conjunctival myxomas [7, 21, 22] and rarely uveal melanotic schwannomas [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A summary of the chromosomal changes is shown in Table 1. The known and poten- tially relevant genes for a case of uveal melanoma are listed in parentheses: chromosomes 1, 2 (including the CNC2 and SF3B1 genes), 14 (including the KTN1 gene), 17 (including the PRKAR1A gene), 18,19,21,22 (including the TTC28 gene), and X (including the EI-F1AX gene). Low-level monosomy 7 and trisomy 8 (including the MYC gene) were also noted, suggesting the presence of a subclonal cell population.…”
Section: Molecular Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 CFM and OFM, in particular, share notable morphological and immunohistochemical overlap with neoplastic myxoma. 38,42,43 Both lesions present with fusiform fibroblasts dispersed in a myxomatous stroma containing mast cells, collagen fibers, and delicate blood vessels. The helpful morphological findings that differentiate CFM/OFM from myxoma include non-infiltrative growth patterns, superficial location, lesion size, and the presence of fragmented and randomly arranged ropey collagen fibers, 38,42 similar to the lesions in our series.…”
Section: F I G U R E 2 Macroscopic Appearance Of Oral Focal Mucinosismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there is controversy concerning some histopathological and immunohistochemical features of CM and COST. Milman and colleagues 5 performed a clinical-pathological multiparametric analysis in patients with CM, COST, and reactive fibromyxoid proliferation and found that all the specimens studied showed strong and diffuse immunoreactivity for CD34; concluding that there were no significant histopathologic and immunohistochemical differences between lesions diagnosed with CM and COST.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%