1982
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(82)90002-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjoint measurement experiment of consumer complaining behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well documented that the probability that consumers will seek redress (i.e., complain) in the case of defective or deficient products or services depends on the costs and benefits involved, including the economic loss suffered by the consumer and the costs (including time and effort) of complaining (e.g., Andreasen, 1988;Didow & Barksdale, 1982;Kolodinsky, 1995;Oliver, 1997). Objective costs and benefits may be considered situational factors in a complaint context.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is well documented that the probability that consumers will seek redress (i.e., complain) in the case of defective or deficient products or services depends on the costs and benefits involved, including the economic loss suffered by the consumer and the costs (including time and effort) of complaining (e.g., Andreasen, 1988;Didow & Barksdale, 1982;Kolodinsky, 1995;Oliver, 1997). Objective costs and benefits may be considered situational factors in a complaint context.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, complaint research has focused mostly on psychological antecedents of complaining and non-complaining (e.g., East, 2000;Harris & Mowen, 2001;Kim et al, 2003;Zeelenberg & Pieters, 2004), whereas the material reasons why people complain receive much less attention. In the early days of complaint research, two to three decades ago, there was more focus on the importance of material reasons for complaining (i.e., the size of the loss or the importance or seriousness of the defect or deficiency; e.g., Bearden & Oliver, 1985;Day, 1984;Day & Landon, 1977;Didow & Barksdale, 1982), but usually the conception of the psychological reasons why some people are more likely to complain than others under the same material circumstances were relatively simple. Ignorance with regard to both material reasons and psychological antecedents is serious, but for different reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large financial loss ma motivate a consumer to seek redress [17]. Redress from retailers may take several forms: full refund, exchange for the same item or another item, credit, or refusal.…”
Section: Redressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the various types of redress on repurchase behaviour should be studied. Previous research [17,26] has found that the dollar value of the product affects the complaint behaviour of the consumer. The dollar values of the products tested were in a limited range from $5 to $100.…”
Section: Implications For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%