2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mycres.2008.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coniolariella hispanica sp. nov. and other additions to Coniolariella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…110(11): 1285 Coniolariella was introduced by DaniaGarcía et al (2006) with C. gamsii (Asgari and Zare) Dania García et al as the type species. Phylogenetic analysis placed Coniolariella within the Xylariales and its close relationship with rosellinia-like genera(Checa et al 2008) and was placed in Xylariaceae inStadler et al (2013).Coniolariella hispanica Checa, Arenal & J.D. Rogers and C. limoniispora var.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110(11): 1285 Coniolariella was introduced by DaniaGarcía et al (2006) with C. gamsii (Asgari and Zare) Dania García et al as the type species. Phylogenetic analysis placed Coniolariella within the Xylariales and its close relationship with rosellinia-like genera(Checa et al 2008) and was placed in Xylariaceae inStadler et al (2013).Coniolariella hispanica Checa, Arenal & J.D. Rogers and C. limoniispora var.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is likely that both the strains MSX92917 and MSX56446 are congeneric (Fig. S2), but Gerwick et al used a different name due to erroneous interpretation of BLAST search data, especially since Coniolariella shows a close phylogenetic relationship with Rosellinia-like genera within the Xylariales [4]. Due to its H2O solubility, mevalocidin (1) was difficult to isolate directly using the traditional protocols common for natural products discovery [7,9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSU sequences of other Coniolariella spp. from a recently published study on this genus [4] were downloaded and analyzed using PHYML. The sequence data obtained for both the MSX strains were deposited in the GenBank (MSX56446: KT835371; MSX92917: KT835372).…”
Section: Molecular Identification Of the Fungal Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The holotype was morphologically revised by Petrini in 1999, who excluded Rosellinia australis from Rosellinia (Figure 6a) due to the presence of soft stromata, perithecia adhering to the stromatal wall, asci without an amyloid apex and lack of a subiculum [57]. This species is now considered a synonym of Coniolariella limoniispora [51].…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%