Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer An
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2001.916288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congestion pricing and user adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical frameworks of congestion pricing have been discussed thoroughly by several authors [4][5] [6] [7]. Kelly et al [4] and Low et al [7] show how selfish users, seeking to maximize their own net benefit, can be given the right incentives so as to globally optimize the social benefit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretical frameworks of congestion pricing have been discussed thoroughly by several authors [4][5] [6] [7]. Kelly et al [4] and Low et al [7] show how selfish users, seeking to maximize their own net benefit, can be given the right incentives so as to globally optimize the social benefit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tâtonnement, the price is updated iteratively until the aggregate user demand meets bandwidth supply. Tâtonnement-based pricing algorithms have been explored in a number of papers [4][5] [6] [7], where the basic idea is to signal a user the marginal cost it imposes on other users (which is also the price in a market-based resource allocation scenario) as an incentive for adaptive applications to adapt their sending rates. Auctioning has been proposed by researchers in the literature [8][9] [10] as another model that allocates scarce bandwidth efficiently, though there is generally no explicit signaling for price before users send their requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pricing mechanisms have been suggested earlier for managing resource allocation and congestion control [1,2]. Researchers have also suggested differentiated pricing schemes based on service and quality [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some of the algorithms assume the knowledge of the user's utility functions, which is generally not practical. Theoretical frameworks of congestion pricing have been discussed thoroughly by several authors [15] [40][41] [42]. Kelly et al [15] and Low et al [40] show how selfish users, seeking to maximize their own net benefit, can be given the right incentives so as to globally optimize the social benefit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECN-based marking has been proposed in [41] to convey congestion information back to the end systems, and the resulting system converges to an optimal system state as long as all utility curves are strictly concave. Instead of only marking the packets, the authors in [42] proposed assigning each packet a price to reflect the con- gestion of the network. These schemes assume network services are best-effort, and rely on a pure market mechanism to maximize social benefit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%