2012
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.106334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital malformations and assisted reproductive technique: Where is assisted reproductive technique taking us?

Abstract: Development of ART has great benefit for millions of couples all over the world and with falling fertility rate there are a growing numbers of children born with the help of ART, it is important to investigate potential risks to these children. IVF-ICSI pregnancies are associated with higher risk for multiple gestation, preterm labor and low birth weight. It is an area of great conflict and interest that whether ART is associated with increased congenital malformations or not. So, this article reviews the data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because serious adverse events, of which fetal malformations is one category, were individually reported in all contraceptive efficacy studies and should have been reported to study investigators by the participant. Accordingly, these data are also consistent with the 4% congenital malformation rate that occurs during spontaneous pregnancies 64 and after artificial reproductive technologies 65 . Nevertheless, there is insufficient power to conclusively exclude the possibility that congenital malformation rates could be increased by MHC, even when all studies are aggregated.…”
Section: 6 Mhc Methods Do Not Increase Fetal Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is because serious adverse events, of which fetal malformations is one category, were individually reported in all contraceptive efficacy studies and should have been reported to study investigators by the participant. Accordingly, these data are also consistent with the 4% congenital malformation rate that occurs during spontaneous pregnancies 64 and after artificial reproductive technologies 65 . Nevertheless, there is insufficient power to conclusively exclude the possibility that congenital malformation rates could be increased by MHC, even when all studies are aggregated.…”
Section: 6 Mhc Methods Do Not Increase Fetal Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…23 Similarly, increased numbers of congenital anomalies are described in infants born through the transfer of cryopreserved embryos. 24 2.5. Imprinting disorders Studies conclude that there is a correlation between assisted reproductive techniques and imprinting disorders.…”
Section: Congenital Abnormalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre los factores de riesgo del PPT se considera el antecedente de parto pretérmino, de rotura prematura de membranas, aborto tardío o feto muerto, la existencia actual de embarazo gemelar o múltiple, polihidramnios, preeclampsia, infecciones urinarias y de transmisión sexual, malformaciones uterinas, incompetencia ístmico-cervical, conización cervical, edad materna mayor, tabaquismo, alcoholismo y uso de sustancias tóxicas, estrés físico y psicológico (16) , y ahora con cierta frecuencia, la gestación obtenida por técnicas de reproducción asistida (17) .…”
Section: Factores De Riesgo -Causasunclassified