2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61309-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Lacrimal System Obstruction: Treatment with Balloon Dilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…system, performed their operation in adult patients in 1989 and in affected children in 1991 (17,18), and consequent studies were performed by other authors (19)(20)(21)(22). In this study we investigated the efficiency of balloon dacryocystoplasty (BDCP) performed primarily for patients over 3 years of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and secondarily for cases with unsuccessful probing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…system, performed their operation in adult patients in 1989 and in affected children in 1991 (17,18), and consequent studies were performed by other authors (19)(20)(21)(22). In this study we investigated the efficiency of balloon dacryocystoplasty (BDCP) performed primarily for patients over 3 years of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and secondarily for cases with unsuccessful probing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BD group no such complications occured and no revision operations were required. In the literature, balloon dacryocystoplasty is defined as an efficient and safe surgical procedure that is extremely well tolerated [21,[27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se realizó la inserción anterógrada del balón por ser una vía a la que esta familiarizado el oftalmólo-go ya que es muy similar al sondaje, lo practicamos con control endoscópico por permitirnos una visualización directa que evita trayectos submucosos y la exposición a radiaciones ionizantes como en el caso de inserción retrograda con fluoroscopia (9).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Esta diferencia puede ser explicada por diferencias en la patogénesis. En los adultos la epífora suele estar causada por etiología de causa adquirida como estenosis involutiva, inflamación e infección crónica siendo por tanto la incidencia de estenosis secundaria alta debido adhesiones y fibrosis de estos tejidos al contrario que en los casos congénitos (9).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified