2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital anomalies are commonly associated with exomphalos minor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
6
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected by electronic chart review. Exomphalos minor was defined as a defect less than 5 cm in size whereas exomphalos major was defined as a defect more than 5 cm in size and/or liver in the sac [1]. A statistical analysis was carried out using Student t test and Fisher's exact test to compare the two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were collected by electronic chart review. Exomphalos minor was defined as a defect less than 5 cm in size whereas exomphalos major was defined as a defect more than 5 cm in size and/or liver in the sac [1]. A statistical analysis was carried out using Student t test and Fisher's exact test to compare the two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study design In this retrospective study 52 neonates with exomphalos were identified from 1996 to 2007. Exomphalos were stratified by the type of defect [exomphalos minor versus major (major defined as defect size more than 5 cm and/or liver in the sac)] [1]. Clinical data, demographic data, and outcome measures of mortality, length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation and age at full enteral feeds were studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants born with exomphalos experiencing respiratory distress at birth are 25 times more likely to die than those without respiratory compromise [21]. The use of prenatal MRI has been used to predict those infants likely to develop respiratory insufficiency [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published incidence of associated anomalies ranges from 45 to 65% [8,15,22]. Abnormal karyotype is present in 11% of patients with EM [22]. Limb abnormalities, ectopic cordis and bladder extrophy also exhibit greater incidence in EM compared to exomphalos minor [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association with cardiac defects Noncardiac structural anomalies [91] 21% Previous history of CHD [10] 8.7% Abnormal ductus venosus [92] 7.5% Increased nuchal translucency [93] 7% Monochorionic twins [23] 5.5% (9.3% in cases with TTS) Tricuspid regurgitation [18] 5.1% Aberrant right subclavian artery [33] 5.1% Consanguinity [94] 4.4% Assisted reproductive technologies [24] 4.3% with a lower success rate such as: visualization of the ductal and aortic arches that can be obtained in 70-80% of cases ( Fig. 3 a, b), the 3-vessel and tracheal views obtained in 60-70% of fetuses ( Fig.…”
Section: Indicationmentioning
confidence: 99%