2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital absence of the pericardium: case presentation and review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
66
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] Although CMR is useful in determination of anatomic abnormalities, the lack of visibility of the pericardium on CMR images does not prove its congenital absence and may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of pericardial absence in up to 10% of patients. 4 In the present case, the features of left ventricular indentation, cardiac displacement, and lung interposition between heart and diaphragm rather than direct visualization of the pericardium suggested the diagnosis, which was confirmed by surgery. In patients with absence of the pericardium, ECG often shows incomplete right bundle-branch block with poor R-wave progression as a result of the leftward displacement of the heart, 4,5 as seen in the present case.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…[1][2][3] Although CMR is useful in determination of anatomic abnormalities, the lack of visibility of the pericardium on CMR images does not prove its congenital absence and may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of pericardial absence in up to 10% of patients. 4 In the present case, the features of left ventricular indentation, cardiac displacement, and lung interposition between heart and diaphragm rather than direct visualization of the pericardium suggested the diagnosis, which was confirmed by surgery. In patients with absence of the pericardium, ECG often shows incomplete right bundle-branch block with poor R-wave progression as a result of the leftward displacement of the heart, 4,5 as seen in the present case.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Imaging is often necessary to confirm the presence, severity, and extent of fluid; to characterize the nature of fluid (transudates vs exudates); to rule out pericardial inflammation; to determine the hemodynamic effect on the heart; and ultimately to guide pericardiocentesis. Although transthoracic echocardiography is the preferred first-line modality for this evaluation, CT and MR imaging often allow for a more comprehensive location of the defect (Fig 5) (67,68). Since herniation is often intermittent in time, positional changes to the left lateral decubitus position, for example, can be helpful in diagnosing pericardial defects.…”
Section: Review: Ct and Mr Imaging Of Pericardial Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost always, neonatal and infantile patients are being diagnosed at the time of surgery for other congenital anomalies usually a congenital diaphragmatic hernia [2]. Reported presenting features of complete pericardial absence in adults include atypical chest pain of varying severity, palpitations, shortness of breath or incidental discovery at the time of cardiothoracic surgeries [4]. Due to vague and atypical symptoms, congenital absence of pericardium can mimic other conditions such as acute coronary syndromes, valvular heart disease like mitral prolapse, pulmonic stenosis, tumours of the lung or heart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defects can either be partial or complete. The most common type is a left sided pericardial absence which accounts for 2/3 of all congenital pericardial defects [4]. Complete absence of the entire pericardium (left and right sided) is consi-dered very rare and accounts for only a fraction of the cases reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%