Confucian culture and executive compensation: Evidence from China

Abstract

Research Question/Issue This study investigates how traditional Confucian culture affects executive compensation from three dimensions: CEO compensation level, CEO pay gap (the pay gap between CEO and other management members), and the gender pay gap. Research Findings/Insights We find that firms' exposure to stronger Confucianism is associated with less CEO compensation, a smaller CEO pay gap, and a larger gender pay gap in China. These findings are consistent with the core values of moderatism, collectivism, and patriarchalism rooted in the Confucian culture. Our findings are robust to different firms' exposure to Confucian culture measures. Endogeneity concerns are further addressed with a subsample of firms that experienced headquarters relocation. Cross‐sectional analyses show that the influence of traditional Confucian culture is more pronounced for firms facing less industry competition, owned by the state, or with a higher concentration of power. Additional analyses show that the Confucian culture also reduces the CEO's pay‐for‐performance sensitivity, weakens pay incentives, and leads to lower firm risk‐taking; however, it also mitigates firm agency problems by reducing firm earnings management and managerial perk consumption. The combination of these positive and negative effects reduces the firm's overall value. Theoretical/Academic Implications This study expands our understanding of the role of informal institutions in corporate behavior. Corporate governance is embedded in the market's formal institutions, which, in turn, are embedded in local informal institutions. Academically, our study suggests further corporate governance research on informal institutions, especially in emerging markets where institutional development is not yet complete and informal institutions play a particularly important role. Practitioner/Policy Implications This study could help practitioners better understand the business culture and compensation contract design in Confucian nations. It also suggests that policymakers consider the effect of informal institutions when designing formal institutions.

The power of culture: Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure?

“…Confucian culture has long emphasized patriarchalism (Jin et al, 2022), a social paradigm in which “men's work centers around outside, women's work centers around the home.” Women are given more family responsibilities (Tan, 2019), because of in agricultural societies they are unable to go out for strenuous physical labor. Thus, they belong to their fathers when they are young, belong to their husbands when they are married, and belong to their sons when they are old.…”

CEO‐TMT faultline and corporate green innovation: The contextual role of Confucian culture

“…On the other hand, the original intention of the Confucian culture to emphasize the principle of "equal distribution" is to achieve social harmony (Ames & Rosemont, 1998;Ziporyn, 2012). Confucius's idea of "Worry not rareness but disparity, not poverty but dispeace" and Tang Dynasty's "decree of equalizing fields" both reflect the fact that equal distribution is the key to reducing the sense of relative deprivation and maintaining social harmony and stability (Jin et al, 2022). However, the impact of CEO-TMT identity-based faultline is insignificant.…”

Executive Compensation Schemes: Accelerants of Agency and Corporate Governance Problems in South Africa

“…Also, while shareholders seek to get maximised value, executives endeavour to maximise personal wealth by negotiating favourable compensation (Bebchuk & Fried, 2006). This is what agency theory seeks to avoid (Al Farooque, Buachoom & Hoang, 2019;Jin et al, 2022). The costs of that avoidance are agency costs such as monitoring, bonding, and residual costs (Meinhövel, 1999cited in Dühnfort, Klein & Lampenius, 2008).…”

“…Corporate governance (CG) is anchored in agency theory and CG encompasses executive remuneration issues (Jin, Li & Liang, 2022;Sarhan & Al-Najjar, 2022). Agency theory identifies shareholders (long-term or short-term) as the main providers of equity capital.…”