2021
DOI: 10.1002/joc.7080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting CHIRPS dataset and in situ stations in the detection of wet and drought conditions in the Brazilian Midwest

Abstract: The states of Mato Grosso (MT) and Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) are located in Midwest Brazil and are dependent on agribusiness, which makes their water regimes of fundamental importance. However, the existing weather stations in these states are limited, and rainfall products are therefore a valuable alternative. The objectives of this study are: (a) to validate the CHIRPS datasets for the states of MT and MS in the Brazilian Midwest region; (b) to evaluate the intraseasonal variability of regional rainfall via CH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CHIRPS data have good consistency in regions with high station density (Funk et al ., 2015a; Funk et al ., 2015b; Duan et al ., 2016; Katsanos et al ., 2016; Marengo et al ., 2021). In Brazil, the CHIRPS dataset is a reference in remote regions or regions with poor or absent rain gauge coverage (Paredes‐Trejo et al ., 2017; Costa et al ., 2019; Costa et al ., 2021; Oliveira‐Júnior et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHIRPS data have good consistency in regions with high station density (Funk et al ., 2015a; Funk et al ., 2015b; Duan et al ., 2016; Katsanos et al ., 2016; Marengo et al ., 2021). In Brazil, the CHIRPS dataset is a reference in remote regions or regions with poor or absent rain gauge coverage (Paredes‐Trejo et al ., 2017; Costa et al ., 2019; Costa et al ., 2021; Oliveira‐Júnior et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gamma PDF parameters α and β estimated at the mentioned scale were calculated. The parameters α and β were estimated using the maximum likelihood method (MLM), which is the most appropriate method [34,35]. Calculations of the α and β parameters were performed to determine the cumulative probability of an observed rainfall event for the adopted scale.…”
Section: Standardized Precipitation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For precipitation and SPI analysis, we used the CHIRPS dataset [61], developed by the United States Geological Survey and the Climate Hazards Group of the University of California, Santa Barbara. This dataset combines pentadal precipitation climatology, nearglobal geostationary thermal infrared satellite observations from the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) and National Climatic Data Center [62], rainfall fields from the atmospheric model of the NOAA Climate Forecast System (CFSv2) [63], and in situ rainfall observations [64,65]. In this study, CHIRPS is used as there is a lack of temporal data from in situ stations throughout the Amazon Basin, and because of their availability from 1981 to the present at a spatial resolution of 0.05 • (~5.3 km) at daily, pentads and monthly temporal resolutions for the near-globe.…”
Section: Rainfall and Standardized Precipitation Index (Spi)mentioning
confidence: 99%