Conformity, obedience to authority, and compliance without pressure to control cigarette butt pollution

Pascual, Alexandre; Felonneau, Marie Line; Guéguen, Nicolas; Lafaille, Emmeline

doi:10.1080/15534510.2013.778214

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, contrary to the first study, in study 2 the SP + BYAF combination had an effect on compliance comparatively to the control condition. This result is consistent with observations by Pascual, Felonneau, Guéguen & Lafaille (2014).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

“…As regards SP and BYAF, studies 1 and 2 failed to observe a chaining effect. This result is consistent with Pascual, Felonneau, Guéguen & Lafaille (2014). However, in study 1 SP + BYAF had no effect on compliance comparatively to the control condition but in study 2, SP + BYAF had a positive effect on compliance gaining.…”

Section: Meta-analysissupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Such results are consistent with our main hypothesis, namely that because of an antinomy between external pressure (SP) and internal pressure (BYAF), it is possible that the two kinds of influence sources (internal vs external) produce a non-additive effect on compliance; whereas in the framework of a chaining hypothesis, the higher the number of influence sources, the higher people's compliance will be. Pascual, Felonneau, Guéguen & Lafaille (2014) already found no chaining effect between SP and BYAF. But in their study, SP + BYAF showed a significant effect comparatively to the control condition.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…However, relatively few publications have directly tested the chaining process in the scientific literature because social psychologists have principally focused on testing single or competing theoretical explanations of compliance gaining. Furthermore, Pascual, Felonneau, Guéguen & Lafaille (2014) failed to obtain a chaining effect when combining two particular strategies: the "but you are free" technique (BYAF) and social proof (SP). In their study, they tried to induce smokers to drop their cigarette butts in an ashtray rather than on the ground.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Does “chaining” always work towards compliance gaining? The case of the “but you are free” technique and social proof applied to charitable donation

Pascual

Salanova

Bouhassine³

et al. 2021

European Review of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

Section: Meta-analysissupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Does “chaining” always work towards compliance gaining? The case of the “but you are free” technique and social proof applied to charitable donation

Pascual

Salanova

Bouhassine³

et al. 2021

European Review of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Learning obedience is the process students learn to avoid being punished by authority, where cognition is inconsistent with behavior [16]. Learning compliance is how students learn to make their family and friends happy; again, cognition and behavior are inconsistent [17].…”

Section: Learning Conformity Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between Self-Efficacy and Learning Conformity among Chinese University Students: Differences by Gender

Xiao

Song

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Although past research highlights the impact of self-efficacy on university students’ learning motivation, examining potential links with specific types of learning conformity is limited. The current study examined associations between Chinese university students’ perceived self-efficacy and learning conformity across different types of learning motivation.Methods: A total of 339 Chinese university students were surveyed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale and the Learning Conformity Scale. Multiple regression models were constructed to focus on the mechanisms of general self-efficacy on learning conformity. Results: (1) There are three types of learning conformity: learning abidance, learning obedience, and learning compliance. (2) General self-efficacy has a negative effect on learning obedience. In contrast, it positively affects learning abidance and learning compliance. (3) The general self-efficacy of girls is lower than that of boys. Still, girls are more likely to be motivated to learn compliance than boys. Conclusions: The study reveals that it is essential to stimulate students’ motivation to learn abidance to love learning from the inside out; to improve girls’ self-efficacy; to raise students’ awareness of self-respect and self-development; and to encourage self-approval in public institutions.

show abstract

What Do Your Eyes Say about Your Conformity? An Observation on the Number of Sales during Online Shopping

Wang

Zhou

Liao

2019

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conformity, obedience to authority, and compliance without pressure to control cigarette butt pollution

Cited by 9 publications

References 27 publications

Does “chaining” always work towards compliance gaining? The case of the “but you are free” technique and social proof applied to charitable donation

Does “chaining” always work towards compliance gaining? The case of the “but you are free” technique and social proof applied to charitable donation

Association between Self-Efficacy and Learning Conformity among Chinese University Students: Differences by Gender

What Do Your Eyes Say about Your Conformity? An Observation on the Number of Sales during Online Shopping

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About