2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
111
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we examine the propensity to C with two individual differences questionnaires which might reveal participant characteristics relevant to cooperative behavior or the desire to maximize profits. Some researchers have reported links between strategic 'giving' and Reward Responsiveness in Public Good Games and variants (Scheres & Sanfey, 2006;Skatova & Ferguson, in press) and others that cooperative behavior is enhanced by reciprocation (Bardsley & Sausgruber, 2005). An interesting aspect of the current task is that cooperative behavior carries no financial reward (e.g., through reciprocation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we examine the propensity to C with two individual differences questionnaires which might reveal participant characteristics relevant to cooperative behavior or the desire to maximize profits. Some researchers have reported links between strategic 'giving' and Reward Responsiveness in Public Good Games and variants (Scheres & Sanfey, 2006;Skatova & Ferguson, in press) and others that cooperative behavior is enhanced by reciprocation (Bardsley & Sausgruber, 2005). An interesting aspect of the current task is that cooperative behavior carries no financial reward (e.g., through reciprocation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reciprocity needs a positive incentive. For instance, Bardsley and Sausgruber (2005) find that a reciprocally motivated agent will contribute to a public good only if he or she receives a benefit from it.…”
Section: Sociological Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an individual farmer is expected to be more willing to comply with a regulation if many farmers respect it (Fehr and Falk, 2002) or, similarly, a farmer has a motivation to fulfil social norms or expectations of the farmer's peer group (Henrich, 2004). Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) and Bardsley and Sausgruber (2005) describe conformity as an incentive to adjust own behaviour according to "social comparisons" even without material consequences. 14 Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) show that people in ultimatum game experiments do not react to information about randomly chosen offers but revise their action if faced with average offers.…”
Section: Sociological Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous empirical research has shown the influence of information on pro-social behavior, even when the information is payoff irrelevant (see, e.g. Bardsley and Sausgruber, 2005;Bicchieri and Xiao, 2008;Bicchieri and Chavez, 2009;Cason and Mui, 1998;Frey and Meier, 2004;Krupka and Weber, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%