1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)93104-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational equilibria of C-methyl groups in piperidines and N-methylpiperidines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 8.9 ppm difference between the resonance signals of the epimeric 3-methylquinolizidines 21 and 22 shows the same influences as in l3C NMR. The upfield shift per gauche interaction is also not very constant:1413 the effect of the gauche -methyl group on the nitrogen shift of 8(e)-methyl-fra/Ls--decahydiOquinoline (17a) is only +5.5 ppm and the upfield shift per interacting methylene group is 5.3 ppm for m-decahydroquinoline (16a) and 4.4 ppm for m-4-?m-butylcyclohexylarnine (23).…”
Section: Roberts Et Al /mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 8.9 ppm difference between the resonance signals of the epimeric 3-methylquinolizidines 21 and 22 shows the same influences as in l3C NMR. The upfield shift per gauche interaction is also not very constant:1413 the effect of the gauche -methyl group on the nitrogen shift of 8(e)-methyl-fra/Ls--decahydiOquinoline (17a) is only +5.5 ppm and the upfield shift per interacting methylene group is 5.3 ppm for m-decahydroquinoline (16a) and 4.4 ppm for m-4-?m-butylcyclohexylarnine (23).…”
Section: Roberts Et Al /mentioning
confidence: 98%