2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformance checking and performance improvement in scheduled processes: A queueing-network perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies concentrated more on algorithms/techniques for conformance checking (Rozinat and van der Aalst, 2008), process discovery (Rozinat et al , 2009), clustering and visualization (Song et al , 2009). Currently, as new tools and techniques continue to emerge (Senderovich et al , 2015, 2016; De Smedt et al , 2015), the number of application-oriented contributions is increasing (Conforti et al , 2015; Schönig et al , 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies concentrated more on algorithms/techniques for conformance checking (Rozinat and van der Aalst, 2008), process discovery (Rozinat et al , 2009), clustering and visualization (Song et al , 2009). Currently, as new tools and techniques continue to emerge (Senderovich et al , 2015, 2016; De Smedt et al , 2015), the number of application-oriented contributions is increasing (Conforti et al , 2015; Schönig et al , 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nguyen et al (2016) proposed the evolution of process performance through the concept of staged phase flow. Senderovich et al (2016) proposed the operational performance improvement method according to queuing network-based conformance inspections and deviation origin analysis. Sun et al (2017) adopted a mirror matrix method based on footprint variant and parallel programming that optimizes the original process according to the log.…”
Section: Integration and Optimization Of Cross-lifecycle Business Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A business seeking to conduct data-driven performance analysis, should first select the type of technique. Descriptive analysis will show the current state and [34], [23], [5], [6], [32], [3] Process Duration -- [41] Fragment Duration Activity Start and End Time [7], [24], [23], [17], [5] Activity Duration -- [19], [31], [29], [34], [7], [24] Waiting Duration [30], [38], [36], [ [21], [22] Framework to extract process characteristics from event logs discriminating between positive and negative cases [5], [6] Comparing waiting duration of similar process in different installations [11], [15] Collaborative Processes [26] Evolution of performance over time [40] Framework for performance-related analysis with information-poor event logs Type Domain…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%