Conflict-Sensitive Climate Change Adaptation: A Review

Abstract

Climate change adaptation (CCA) evolved in the global policy framework in the early 1990s. However, it began to flourish about a decade later through a subsequent development of institutions, policies and supporting financial mechanisms. Various adaptation approaches and development practices have been evolving over the last couple of decades through a process of scrutiny, debates, and critiques. One such recent approach is called conflict-sensitive adaptation, which encompasses concepts to understand potential conflict-inflicting elements and peacebuilding aspects of adaptation interventions. This paper examines 35 peer-reviewed research articles that have analysed field data with the notion of conceptualising conflict-sensitive CCA initiatives. Emerging key results were presented and discussed in different academic forums to stimulate peer reflections and debates. We found that the understanding of conflict-sensitive adaptation has its universality in engaging with diverse stakeholders. However, practicalities were different in the cases of the global north and the global south. In the global south, there is a concentration of research in areas of pre-existing conflict in Africa and Asia, where climate change links are often assumed from IPCC reports in order to compensate for the unavailability of field data. However, from the perspective of adaptation politics and governance, there is a concerted urge for the emancipatory participation of local and marginalised populations. We argue for a need to pretest adaptation projects through a conflict lens. Decolonising the adaptation and understanding of local geography is critical in such planning.

Integrating Sectors, Scales and Disciplines in the Climate-Health Nexus: A Framework for Systemic Risks and Multi-Stressors Vulnerability Research

“…Spatial overlap is a substantial factor in accumulating stressors 32 , and cities are unique in that they combine multiple exposures, connect systems, and concentrate infrastructure, population, and goods, thus being especially vulnerable to multiple stressors 10,35 . The focus on non-climatic stressors seeks to reconcile variable and often conflicting value systems 2,36 . For example, watershed-scale resilience might be unjust and decrease resilience for those displaced by dam construction projects 30 .…”

Limits to the Anthropocene: geopolitical conflict or cooperative governance?

“…Accordingly, attention must be paid to social and ecological compatibility and conflict avoidance at an early stage, based on a holistic view of material and energy flows, consequential effects and acceptability. Thus, it is important to design mitigation, adaptation and protection measures (also in the context of geoengineering) in a conflict-sensitive manner (Nadiruzzaman et al, 2022) and avoid adaptation limits that trigger systemic risks and tipping points (Juhola et al, 2022). A key question is who should be protected against climate impacts and who should bear the costs and risks.…”

Integrating security risks in local adaptation to disaster risks and climate change in the Sahel region: the Badolo LocalMultiriskAdapation model

“…In the Sahel region, the impacts of security risks on economic sectors, basic social services and political dynamics profoundly modify local resilience challenges [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. They modify contextual vulnerabilities to disaster risks and climate change, increase resilience needs and alter local resilience course and capacities [8][9][10][11][12]. The consequences of security risks could include significant local resilience to climate change regressions.…”