2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conflict in the Mechanism and Kinetics of the Barrierless Reaction between SH and NO2 Radicals

Abstract: There are some unsettled issues regarding the mechanism and kinetics of an important atmospheric reaction of NO radical with the SH radical. The existing mechanism is based on the formation of HSO and NO radicals, both of which can result only along one barrierless channel. However, the detection of NO radical has never been reported though the formation of HSO radical has been followed in some studies to determine the rate constants. The latter are mainly obtained by monitoring the SH decay, but rate constant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite various attempts, the transition state could not be located for radical addition at this level of theory. Analysis of relaxed scans of the forming Ni–C bond (see the Supporting Information for details) revealed a barrierless interconversion between 3 and 4 , while calculations optimized in the gas phase revealed a small energetic barrier (ca. 3 kcal/mol) between these two species (see the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite various attempts, the transition state could not be located for radical addition at this level of theory. Analysis of relaxed scans of the forming Ni–C bond (see the Supporting Information for details) revealed a barrierless interconversion between 3 and 4 , while calculations optimized in the gas phase revealed a small energetic barrier (ca. 3 kcal/mol) between these two species (see the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details associated with a given potential energy surface may depend on computational method, see Figure as an example for C 2 D 5 CHFCl, but the main features of the exit channel for 1,1-HCl elimination can be accepted. For cases with inner and outer transition states, the observed rate constant is given by eq ; k HX , k DIS , and k R are elementary RRKM rate constants; k HX refers to HCl elimination, and k DIS and k R refer to dissociation and reverse reaction of the adduct: If k DIS is larger than k R , k obs , the observed rate constant, is just k HX , which is the case for the majority of 1,1-HF elimination reactions, because E 0 (1,1-HF) is larger than the enthalpy of reaction. However, for 1,1-HCl reactions, k DIS may be comparable to k R because E 0 (1,1-HCl) is less than the enthalpy, and it is necessary to have an estimate for k DIS .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissociation belongs to the class of barrier-less unimolecular reactions, and variation transition-state theory is needed for analysis. , For our model system, five frequencies of CH 3 (F)­C:HCl will be converted to rotational and translational motions of products upon dissociation. These transitional frequencies are four bending modes of HCl relative to CH 3 (F)­C: plus the C:--(HCl) stretch mode, which becomes the reaction coordinate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have gradually elongated the Na + -sugar distance by 0.5 Å in each step for 40 steps in total. At each of the 40 geometries, we have calculated the vibrational frequencies and the single-point energies at B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and MP2/6-311+G(d,p) levels, respectively, and determined the trial CVT rate constant: 58 Here, s is an index representing one of the geometries along the reaction coordinate. Note that, for saving computational costs, the vibrational partition function of the trial TS has been calculated based on frequencies at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level, while the reaction barrier has been estimated from MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level electronic energies and B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level ZPE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%