Collision-induced dissociation of sodiated α-glucose, β-glucose, α-galactose, β-galactose, α-mannose, and β-mannose was studied using electronic structure calculations and resonance excitation in a low-pressure linear ion trap. We made an extensive search of conformers and transition states in calculations to ensure the transition state with the lowest barrier height for each dissociation channel could be located. The major dissociation channels, in addition to desodiation, are cross-ring dissociation and dehydration. Cross-ring dissociation starts with H atom transfer from the O1 atom to the O0 atom, followed by the cleavage of the C1-O0 bond. Dehydration of the anomer with O1 and O2 atoms in the cis configuration involves the transfer of an H atom from the O2 atom to the O1 atom, followed by the cleavage of the C1-O1 bond. In contrast, dehydration of the anomer with O1 and O2 atoms in the trans configuration mainly occurs through H atom transfer from the O3 or O2 atom to the O1 atom for glucose, from the O3 or O4 atom to the O1 atom for galactose, and from the O4 or O2 atom to the O1 atom for mannose, followed by the cleavage of the C1-O1 bond. The dehydration barrier heights are lower than those of cross-ring dissociation for cis anomers, but higher than those of cross-ring dissociation for trans anomers. The relative barrier heights from calculations are consistent with the experimental measurements of branching ratios. Both computational and experimental results show that the branching ratio of dehydration can be generalized as a simple rule for rapidly identifying the anomeric configurations of these monosaccharides.

The mechanism for the collision-induced dissociation (CID) of two sodiated N-acetylhexosamines (HexNAc), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), was studied using quantum-chemistry calculations and resonance excitation in a low-pressure linear ion trap. Experimental results show that the major dissociation channel of the isotope labeled [1-18O, D5]-HexNAc is the dehydration by eliminating HDO, where OD comes from the OD group at C3. Dissociation channels of minor importance include the 0,2A cross-ring dissociation. No difference has been observed between the CID spectra of the α- and β-anomers of the same HexNAc. At variance, the CID spectra of GlcNAc and GalNAc showed some differences, which can be used to distinguish the two structures. It was observed in CID experiments involving disaccharides with a HexNAc at the nonreducing end that a β-HexNAc shows a larger dissociation branching ratio for the glycosidic bond cleavage than the α-anomer. This finding can be exploited for the rapid identification of the anomeric configuration at the glycosidic bond of HexNAc-R′ (R′ = sugar) structures. The experimental observations indicating that the dissociation mechanisms of HexNAcs are significantly different from those of hexoses were explained by quantum-chemistry calculations. Calculations show that ring opening is the major channel for HexNAcs in a ring form. After ring opening, dehydration shows the lowest barrier. In contrast, the glycosidic bond cleavage becomes the major channel for HexNAcs at the nonreducing end of a disaccharide. This reaction has a lower barrier for β-HexNAcs as compared with the barrier of the corresponding α-anomers, consistent with the higher branching ratio for β-HexNAcs observed in experiment.