2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-Body Image in a clinical eating disorder sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate the fact that high degrees of cognitive fusion compete with BAD and depressive disorder (GILLANDERS et al, 2014b;LEVIN, 2019b;PINTO-GOUVEIA et al, 2020). This way, the degree of cognitive fusion determines how involved the individual is in their specific content of cognitions (BARNEY et al, 2021;GILLANDERS et al, 2014b). As a result, in those with higher degrees of cognitive fusion, such contents are seen as absolute truths and can interfere with their behavior.…”
Section: Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results corroborate the fact that high degrees of cognitive fusion compete with BAD and depressive disorder (GILLANDERS et al, 2014b;LEVIN, 2019b;PINTO-GOUVEIA et al, 2020). This way, the degree of cognitive fusion determines how involved the individual is in their specific content of cognitions (BARNEY et al, 2021;GILLANDERS et al, 2014b). As a result, in those with higher degrees of cognitive fusion, such contents are seen as absolute truths and can interfere with their behavior.…”
Section: Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, in those with higher degrees of cognitive fusion, such contents are seen as absolute truths and can interfere with their behavior. For example, individuals who merge in a thought like "I am stupid" and accept that as absolute truths (BARNEY et al, 2021), may experience a decrease in self-esteem, which could worsen depression.…”
Section: Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation): RMSEA measures the discrepancy between the model's predictions and the observed data, accounting for model complexity. Assessment of Discriminant Validity: As reported by Barney and Barrett [53], the evaluation of discriminant validity involved the calculation of the square root of the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct. Discriminant validity is a statistical principle utilized to ensure that different constructs or factors under examination in a study are indeed distinguishable from one another.…”
Section: Model Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was carried out [43] to validate the questionnaires and scales, wherein supplies were indicators and the groups of supplies were factors. The null hypothesis for this statistical analysis was that the proposed model fits the data, in which each indicator contributes to the factor additively and in equal proportion [44][45][46].…”
Section: Consultation With Experts and Existing Demands In Avocado Pr...mentioning
confidence: 99%